经改进的腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术与传统开腹子宫全切术的效果对比

Comparison of the Effects of Improved Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Traditional Open Hysterectomy

目的分析子宫病变采取腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术与传统开腹子宫全切术的效果对比。方法 50例子宫良性病变患者,按照住院顺序分成对照组和实验组,各25例,对照组采用传统开腹子宫全切术,实验组采用腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术。结果实验组住院费用高于对照组,但手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论临床中腹腔镜下阴式子宫切除术具备清晰、伤口小的优点。

Objective To compare the effect of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and traditional open hysterectomy for uterine diseases. Methods 50 cases of uterine benign lesions were divided into control group and experimental group according to the order of hospitalization, 25 cases were divided into two groups, the control group was used traditional open hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy was used in the experimental group. ResultsThe hospitalization expenses in the experimental group were higher than that in the control group, but the operation time, the amount of bleeding and the length of stay in hospital were lower than those in the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Clinical application of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy has the advantages of clear and small wound.