期刊文献+

不同年龄组幕上脑实质室管膜瘤ADC值特点分析 被引量:2

Characteristics of ADC Values in Different Age Groups of Supratentorial Intraparenchymal Ependymoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同年龄组幕上脑实质室管膜瘤ADC值特点及ADC值在幕上脑实质室管膜瘤诊断中的应用价值。方法搜集33例经手术和病理证实的幕上脑实质室管膜瘤患者影像资料,包括MRI平扫、扩散加权成像(DWI)及增强检查,将患者分为儿童组(〈12岁)、成人组(≥18岁),对两组不同病理类型ADC值进行统计学分析和均值比较。结果儿童组12例,平均r ADC值0.94±0.52,WHOⅡ型4例,WHOⅡ~Ⅲ型1例,WHOⅢ型7例;成人组21例,平均r ADC值1.17±0.36,WHOⅡ型1例,WHOⅡ~Ⅲ型2例,WHOⅢ型18例;WHOⅡ型r ADC值儿童组小于成人组;WHOⅡ~Ⅲ型r ADC值儿童组小于成人组;WHOⅢ型儿童组r ADC值小于成人组,两组间r ADC值差异具有统计学意义(t=3.29,P=0.00)。结论儿童组、成人组幕上脑实质室管膜瘤影像表现不同,r ADC值存在差异,儿童组各病理类型r ADC值均小于成人组。ADC值在幕上脑实质室管膜瘤诊断中具有重要意义。 Objective To assess the characteristics of ADC values in different age groups of supratentorial intraparenchymal ependymomas( SIEs). Methods A retrospective analysis of 33 patients with SIE which were confirmed by surgery and pathology,all patients were examined by head MRI with contrast and DWI,Patients were divided into two groups according to age: children and adults. T test and Mean comparison were used to analyze the difference of r ADC values. Results Mean r ADC in the children group( n = 12) is 0. 94 ± 0. 52,including 4 cases of WHOⅡ,1 case of WHOⅡ- Ⅲ,7cases of WHO Ⅲ; Mean r ADC in the adults group( nn = 21) is 1. 17 ± 0. 36,including 1 case of WHOⅡ,2 cases of WHOⅡ- Ⅲ,18 cases of WHOⅢ. There were significant differences among the two groups( WHOⅢ) in r ADC value( t = 3. 29,P = 0. 00). There were differences among the two groups( WHO Ⅱ and Ⅱ- Ⅲ). Conclusion There were MR and r ADC characteristics differences in the SIEs in different age groups. Children's group less than adult's group. ADC values can be applied as a complementary tool in the preoperative diagnosis of SIEs.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期1337-1340,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 2011河南省科技厅重点攻关项目(编号:1121023-10703)
关键词 室管膜瘤 磁共振成像 年龄 表观扩散系数 Pendymoma Magnetic resonance imaging Age Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1鱼博浪,王世捷,张明,郭佑民,王泽忠,杨广夫.幕上脑实质室管膜瘤CT和MR诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(11):765-769. 被引量:43
  • 2Pajtler KW, WittH, Sill M, et al. Molecular Classification of Ependy- mal Tumors Across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades,and Age Groups[ J]. Cancer Ce11,2015,27:728-743.
  • 3Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classifica- tion of tumours of the central nervous system[ J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2007,114:97-109.
  • 4汤丽华,宦怡,任静,崔金利,徐俊卿,赵海涛,常英娟,葛雅丽,刘莹,印弘.不同级别室管膜瘤MRI表现分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2009,25(3):309-311. 被引量:11
  • 5Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P,et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the U- nited States in 2007-2011 [ J]. Neuro oncol,2014,16 :ivl - iv63.
  • 6Momno L, Bantisto FJ, Zacharoulis S. Outcome of teenagers and Young adults with ependymoma:the Royal Marsden experience [ J ]. Childs Nerv Syst,2009,25 : 1047-1052.
  • 7Bulakbasi N, Guvenc L, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the ap- parent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors [ J ]. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2004,28:735-746.
  • 8Guo AC,Cumminga TJ, Dash RC, et al. Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas : comparison of water diffusidility and histologic charac- teristics [ J ]. Radiology, 2002,224 : 177-183.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Hoeffel C , Boukobza M, Polivka M, et al . MR manifestations of subependymomas[J]. AJNR, 1995,16 (10) : 2121-2129.
  • 2Jallo GI , Zagzag D , Epstein F. Intramedullary subependymoma of the spinal cord[J]. Neurosurgery, 1996,38 (2) : 251- 257.
  • 3Tzerakis N, Georgakoulias N, Kontogeorgos G, et al. Intraparenehymal myxopapillary ependymoma: case report [J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 55(4):981.
  • 4David N, Louis Hiroko ,Ohgaki Otmar D,et al . The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system[J]. Acta Neuropathology, 2007,114 (2) : 97-109.
  • 5鱼博浪,中枢神经系统CT和MR鉴别诊断,1996年,78页
  • 6田庚戊,天津医学院学报,1989年,13卷,38页
  • 7鱼博浪,王世捷,张明,郭佑民,王泽忠,杨广夫.幕上脑实质室管膜瘤CT和MR诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(11):765-769. 被引量:43

共引文献52

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部