期刊文献+

原发性血小板增多症诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016年版) 被引量:70

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of essential thrombcythaemia (2016)
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了进一步规范我国血液科医师对原发性血小板增多症(ET)患者的临床诊治,由中华医学会血液学分会白血病淋巴瘤学组牵头,在广泛征求国内专家意见的基础上,最终达成了ET的诊断程序、实验室检查、诊断标准和治疗原则等方面的共识。
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期833-836,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1徐俊卿,徐泽锋,王静雅,李冰,孙秀娟,秦铁军,张悦,张宏丽,方力维,潘丽娟,胡耐博,曲士强,肖志坚.615例Ph染色体/BCR—ABL融合基因阴性骨髓增殖性肿瘤患者的症状负荷评估[J].中华血液学杂志,2016,37(1):26-29. 被引量:16
  • 2Harrison CN, Bareford D, Butt N, et al. Guideline for investiga- tion and management of adults and children presenting with a thrombocytosis [J]. Br J Haematol, 2010, 149 (3):352-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08122.x.
  • 3Barbui T, Barosi G, Birgegard G, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (6):761-770. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2010.31.8436.
  • 4Harrison CN, Butt N, Campbell P, et al. Modification of British Committee for Standards in Haematology diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythaemia [J]. Br J Haematol, 2014, 167 (3): 421-423. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12986.
  • 5Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26 Suppl 5:v85-99. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv203.
  • 6Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia[J]. Blood, 2016, 127 (20):2391-2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.
  • 7Besses C, Hemfindez-Boluda JC, Prez Encinas M, et al. Current opinion and consensus statement regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with essential thrombocythemia: a survey of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) using the Delphi method[J]. Ann Hematol, 2016, 95 (5):719-732. doi: 10.1007/ s00277-016-2614-1.
  • 8Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment[J]. Leukemia, 2008, 22(2):437-438. doi:10.1038/sj. leu.2404914.
  • 9Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J. Prodromal myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 WHO classification [J]. Am J Hematol, 2010, 85( 1 ):62-69. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21543.
  • 10Barbui T, Thiele J, Vannucchi AM, et al. Problems and pitfalls regarding WHO-defined diagnosis of early/prefibrotic primarymyelofibrosis versus essential thrombocythemia [J]. Leukemia, 2013, 27( 10):1953-1958. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.74.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Mesa RA, Verstovsek S, Cervantes F, et al. Primary myelofibro- sis (PMF), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF), blast phase PMF (PMF-BP): Consensus on terminology by the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWG-MRT) IJ]. Leuk Res, 2007, 31 (6):737- 740.
  • 2Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs ~ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(33):4098-4103.
  • 3Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Facchetti F, et al. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity [J]. Haematologica, 2005, 90(8):1128-1132.
  • 4Tefferi A, Vardiman JW. Classification and diagnosis of myelo- proliferative neoplasms: the 2008 World Health Organization cri- teria and point-of-care diagnostic algorithms [J]. Leukemia, 2008, 22 ( 1 ): 14-22.
  • 5Tefferi A, Thiele J, Vannuechi AM, et al. An overview on CALR and CSF3R mutations and a proposal for revision of WHO diag- nostic eriteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms [Jl. Leukemia, 2014, 28(7):1407-1413.
  • 6Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the Inter- national Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treat- ment[J]. Blood, 2009, 113( 13): 2895-2901.
  • 7Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment) IJ~. Blood, 2010, 115(9):1703-1708.
  • 8Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status I J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(4):392-397.
  • 9Xu Z, Gale RP, Zhang Y, et al. Unique features of primary myelofibrosis in Chinese I J ]. Blood, 2012, 119 ( 11 ) :2469-2473.
  • 10Barosi G, Ambrosetti A, Finelli C, et al. The Italian Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Criteria for Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia~J~. Br J Haematol, 1999, 104(4):730-737.

共引文献45

同被引文献367

引证文献70

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部