期刊文献+

真性红细胞增多症和原发性血小板增多症后骨髓纤维化患者的预后研究 被引量:4

Analysis of prognostic factors in Chinese patients with post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估适用于原发性骨髓化(PMF)患者的国际预后积分系统(IPSS)、动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS)、修订的动态国际预后积分系统(DIPSS plus)、基于我国PMF患者临床特征提出的修订IPSS(IPSS-Chinese)、修订DIPSS(DIPSS-Chinese)及针对欧美真性红细胞增多症(PV)后骨髓纤维化(post-PV MF)和原发性血小板增多症(ET)后骨髓纤维化(post-ET MF)患者制定的继发性骨髓纤维化预后模型(MYSEC-PM)对我国post-PV MF和post-ET MF患者的预后效力,并探讨post-PV/ET MF患者的预后因素。方法回顾性分析1984年3月至2013年12月期间连续收治的55例post-PV/ET MF患者的临床资料,使用IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese、DIPSS-Chinese和MYSEC-PM对患者进行预后分组及评估,并对可能的预后因素进行分析。结果55例post-PV/ET MF患者中男20例、女35例,中位年龄59(20-88)岁。post-PV MF 32例(58.2%),post-ET MF 23例(41.8%)。诊断PV/ET至转化为MF的中位时间为7.8(1.1-23.4)年。所有患者中位随访37(1-156)个月,44例(80.0%)存活,11例(20.0%)死亡,中位生存时间为110.0(95% CI 87.5-132.8)个月。采用IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese及MYSEC-PM对患者进行预后分组,各组患者的生存预后差异均无统计学意义(P〉 0.05)。单因素分析示HGB〈100 g/L是post-PV/ET MF患者的不良预后因素(P=0.003)。结论适用于PMF患者的IPSS、DIPSS、DIPSS plus、IPSS-Chinese及MYSEC-PM不能准确地对我国post-PV/ET MF患者进行预后分组。HGB〈100 g/L是post-PV/ET MF患者的不良预后因素,可作为制定治疗方案的参考。 ObjectiveTo evaluate the performances of the prognostic scoring systems devised for primary myelofibrosis(PMF)and the new developed MYSEC-PM(Mysec Prognostic Model)and investigate the risk factors in Chinese patients with post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis(post-PV/ET MF). The most widely used prognostic scoring systems in PMF included the International Prognostic Scoring System(IPSS), dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System(DIPSS), refined DIPSS(DIPSS plus), modified IPSS for Chinese(IPSS-Chinese), and modified DIPSS for Chinese(DIPSS-Chinese).MethodsThe clinical and hematologic information of 55 consecutive patients diagnosed with post-PV/ET MF from March 1984 to December 2013 were retrospectively collected. All post-PV/ET MF patients were categorized according to IPSS, DIPSS, DIPSS plus, IPSS-Chinese, DIPSS-Chinese and MYSEC-PM, and the possible prognostic factors were statistically analyzed.ResultsFifty five patients diagnosed with post-PV MF(n=32)or post-ET MF(n=23)were analyzed with a median age of 59(range: 20-88)years old, including 20 males and 35 females. Median time from original diagnosis to myelofibrosis was 7.8(range: 1.1-23.4)years. With a median follow up from post-PV/ET MF diagnosis of 37(range: 1-156)months, 44(80.0%)patients were censored alive, 11(20.0%)patients died. Median survival was 110(95% CI 87.5-132.8)months. Using IPSS, DIPSS, DIPSS plus, IPSS-Chinese and MYSEC-PM criteria, there were no statistically significances in survival among different risk groups(P〉0.05). In univariate analyses HGB〈100 g/L(P=0.003)was the only factor associated with poorer overall survival. The prognosis in subjects with HGB≥100 g/L was significantly better than that with HGB〈100 g/L(median OS: not reached vs 47 months, P=0.003).ConclusionIPSS, DIPSS, DIPSS plus, IPSS-Chinese and MYSEC-PM did not accurately discriminate different risk categories in post PV/ET MF patients. HGB〈 100 g/L was associated with poor outcome in post-PV/ET MF patients.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期876-880,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
关键词 真性红细胞增多症 血小板增多 原发性 骨髓纤维化 预后积分系统 Polycythemia vera Thrombocythemia, essential Myelofibrosis Prognostic scoring system
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Barbui T, Barosi G, Birgegard G, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (6): 761-770. doi: 10.1200/JCO. 2010.31.8436.
  • 2Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myeloflbrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment[J]. Blood, 2009, 113 (13): 2895-2901. doi: 10.1182/ blood-2008-07-170449.
  • 3Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment) [J]. Blood, 2010, 115 (9): 1703-1708. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09- 245837.
  • 4Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (4): 392-397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446.
  • 5Xu Z, Gale RP, Zhang Y, et al. Unique features of primary myelofibrosis in Chinese [J]. Blood, 2012, 119 (11): 2469- 2473. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-389866.
  • 6Passamonti F, Alessandro V, Domenica C, et al. A New Interna- tional Multicenter-Based Model to Predict Survival in Myelofi- brosis Secondary to Polycythemia and Thrombocythemia: The Mysec Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) [J]. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 2014, 124(21 ):1826.
  • 7Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essentialthrombocythemia mye|ofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment[J]. Leukemia, 2008, 22 (2): 437-438. doi:10.1038/sj. leu.2404914.
  • 8Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, et al. Refined cytogenetic- risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in pri- mary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients [J]. Leukemia, 2011, 25 (1): 82-88. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.234.
  • 9Patnaik MM, Caramazza D, Gangat N, et al. Age and platelet count are IPSS-independent prognostic factors in young patients with primary myelofibrosis and complement IPSS in predicting very long or very short survival [J]. Eur J Haematol, 2010, 84 (2): 105-108. doi: 10.111 l/j. 1600-0609.2009.01373.x.
  • 10Tefferi A, Siragusa S, Hussein K, et al. Transfusion-dependency at presentation and its acquisition in the first year of diagnosis are both equally detrimental for survival in primary myelofibro- sis--prognostic relevance is independent of IPSS or karyotype [J]. Am J Hematol, 2010, 85( 1 ):14-17. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21574.

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部