期刊文献+

《国际食品法典》标准制定程序的合法性危机与应对 被引量:1

The Legitimacy Crisis and Countermeasures in the Formulation of International Food Safety Standards of the Codex
原文传递
导出
摘要 《国际食品法典》标准制定的"八步二读"程序强调协商一致决策规则,保障所有相关主体的利益被同等考量,确保法典标准的合法性。WTO成立后,法典标准法律地位得到增强,标准制定实践逐渐偏离协商一致规则,显现出透明度欠缺、参与度不足等问题从而面临合法性危机。修改完善程序规则,重视科学的基础作用,保障发展中国家及公共利益非政府组织广泛参与,增强公开透明度等是应对合法性危机的关键。 With the implementation mechanism of the WTO, the practice of approving the standards by consensus in the Codex have begun to change. There is the legitimacy crisis in the formulation process of the Codex. Therefore, firstly the formulation process of the Codex needs further improvement, especially its process of "eight steps and two readings" in order to promote the approval of international standards by consensus. Furthermore, the role and importance of science should be emphasized and paid much attention to. Lastly, it is necessary to help and support the developing countries and the NGOs of the public interest to improve their ability to participate in the Codex activities.
作者 江虹 JIANG Hong(School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China School of Law, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期75-79,共5页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖南省哲学社会科学基金一般项目(14YBA213)
关键词 《国际食品法典》 标准制定程序 合法性 International Food Safety Standards of the Codex formulation process of standards, legitimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献35

  • 1云振宇,刘文,蔡晓湛,王乃铝,栾晏.我国与国际食品法典委员会(CAC)食品添加剂使用限量标准的对比分析研究[J].中国食品添加剂,2009,20(3):43-47. 被引量:14
  • 2FAO. Understanding the codex alimentarius[ R]. Rome: WHO/ FAO, 2003 .
  • 3联合国粮食及农业组织,世界卫生组织.食品法典委员会:程序手册[M].18版,罗马:联合国粮食及农业组织,2009.
  • 4联合国粮食及农业组织.食品法典委员会2008-2013年战略计划[R].Rome:WHO/FAO,2008.
  • 5Codex Committee Documents for General Principle, Participation of developing countries in the work of codex, CX/GP 09/25/9 [ EB/OL ]. ( 2009-04-01 ) [ 2009-09-25 ]. http:// www. codexalimentarius. net.
  • 6Codex Committee Documents for General Principle, Review of the statements of principle on the role of science and the extent to which other factors are taken into account: role of science and other factors in relalion to risk analysis,CX/GP 00/7 [ EB/OL].( 2009-04-01 ) [ 2009-07 ]. http ://www. codexalimentarius, net.
  • 7国际食品法典委员会.CODEX STAN192-1995食品添加剂通用标准[S/OL].[2009-09-25].http://www.codexalimentarius.net.
  • 8Codex Report for Commission,私营标准对食物链及公共标准制定程序的影响,ALINORM09/32/9D第Ⅱ部分[R/OL],[2009-09-25].http://www.codexalimentarius.net.
  • 9Codex Report for Commission, Report of 32nd Codex Alimentarius Commission, ALINORM 09/32/REP [ R ]. [ 2009- 09-25]. http ://www. codexalimentarius, net .
  • 10Wikipedia, Codex Alimentarius [ EB/OL ]. [ 2009-11-18 ]. http://en, wikipedia, org/wiki/Codex _ Alimentarius # Controversy.

共引文献78

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部