摘要
2015年6月实施的《最高人民法院关于审理环境侵权责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第1条第1款关于环境侵权行为构成要件的规定有待商榷。在环境侵权领域,应当为权利保护与行为自由划定一定界限,“国家保护环境防止污染的规定”可以作为这一界限。据此,违法性应当作为环境侵权责任的构成要件,这是立法的合理选择。对我国现行法的相关规定也可以作出相应的合理解释。此外,在环境侵权中,《侵权责任法》第24条、《物权法》第92条也有适用的空间。
Interpretations Concerning the Application of forced on June ,2015. Article 1 of The Supreme People's Court Law for the Environmental Tort on Certain Issues Dispute Cases enpar. 1 of this instrument, which concerns about the elements of environments tort, is worth discussing. In the field of environmental tort, there ought to be a dividing line between protection of rights and freedom of actions, and the national regulation of protecting environment and preventing pollution can be regarded as this dividing line.. Thus, illegality shall be an element of liability for environmental tort, which is a reasonable choice of legislation. Reasonable explanations can also be made pursuant to current laws in China. Besides, Article 24 of Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 92 of Real Right Law of the People' s Republic of China are also applicable in the field of environmental tort.
出处
《湘江青年法学》
2015年第2期127-143,共17页
Law Journal of Xiangjiang Youth
关键词
环境侵权
权利保护
行为自由
立法论解释论
Environmental Tort
Protection of Rights
Freedom of Actions
Legislative Theory
Interpretative Theory