期刊文献+

基于VFM的地铁PPP项目可行性研究 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目前我国在大力推行政府与社会资本合作(PPP)项目,而对于物有所值(VFM)评估方法的研究比较浅薄,大部分都是一些对于VFM的介绍,并没有真正将VFM运用到PPP模式的系统性研究中去。因此,对基于VFM的地铁PPP项目的决策阶段进行研究,构建VFM的基本参数,以VFM评估方法作为评价体系,实例计算地铁PPP项目的可行性,具有一定现实意义。
作者 周光权
出处 《项目管理技术》 2016年第10期13-18,共6页 Project Management Technology
基金 江西省社会科学"十二五"(2015年)规划项目"基于BIM的城市轨道交通PPP模式应用研究(15GL34)" 2015年度江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目"‘一带一路’战略下跨国高速铁路PPP模式应用研究(GL1599)"
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Maguire G, Malinovitch A. Development of PPPs in Victoria [ J ]. Australian Accounting Review, 2008, 14 ( 33 ) : 27 -33.
  • 2Grimsey D, Lewis M K. Are public private partnerships value for money.'? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views [ J].Accounting Forum, 2005, 29 (4) : 345-378.
  • 3Burger P, Hawkesworth I. How to altain value for money: com- paring PPP and traditional infrastructure public procurement [J]. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2011, 11 (1): 91-146.
  • 4Takim R, Ismail K, Nawawi A H, et al. The Malaysian private finance initiative and value for money [ J ] . Asian Social Sci- ence, 2009, 5 (3): 55-64.
  • 5English L M, Guthrie J. Driving privately financed projects in Australia: what makes them tick [ J]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2003, 16 (3) : 493-511.
  • 6Bidne D, Kirby A, Luvela L J, et al. The value for money anal- ysis: a guide for more effective PSC and PPP evaluation [ R/ OL ]. http: //www. neppp, org/wp-eontent/uploads/2013/03/ PS-051012ValueForMoney-paper. pdf.
  • 7Moralos D, Amekudzi A. A state of the practice of value for mon- ey analysis in comparing public private partnership to traditional procurement [ J ] . Journal of Public Works Management Poli- cy, 2008, 13 (2): 114-125.
  • 8袁竞峰,王帆,李启明,邓小鹏.基础设施PPP项目的VfM评估方法研究及应用[J].现代管理科学,2012(1):27-30. 被引量:74
  • 9孙慧,周颖,范志清.PPP项目评价中物有所值理论及其在国际上的应用[J].国际经济合作,2009(11):70-74. 被引量:48
  • 10Glendinning R.. The concept of value for money [ J ]. Interna- tional Journal of Public Sector Management, 2013, 40 ( 1 ) : 160-167.

二级参考文献20

  • 1胡伟.西方国家政府采购法中物有所值原则[J].行政与法,2000(5):38-39. 被引量:4
  • 2胡振.PFI的科学内涵及经济效果[J].建筑经济,2005,26(7):49-53. 被引量:15
  • 3M.H. Sobhiyah, M.R. Bemanian, Y. Kh. Kashtiban, 2009, Increasing VFM in PPP power station projects-Case study: Rudeshur gas turbine power station, International Journal of Project Management, Vol.27, pp.512-521.
  • 4I. Demirag, M. Dubnick, M. I. Khadaroo, 2004, A framework for examining accountability and value for money in the UK's private finance initiative, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, No. 15, pp.63-76.
  • 5J. Broadbent, J. Gill, R. Laughlin, 2003, Evaluating the private finance initiative in the National Health Service. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 16, No.3, pp.422-445.
  • 6David Heald, 2003, Value for money tests and accounting treatment in PFI schemes,Accounting Auditing &Accountability Journal, Vol. 16No.3,pp342-371.
  • 7J. Shaoul, 2005, A critical financial analysis of the Private Finance Initiative: Selecting a financing method or allocating economic wealth? Critical Perspectives in Accounting, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp.441-471.
  • 8Damn Grimsey, Mervyn K. Lewis, 2005, Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views, Accounting Forum, No.29, pp.345-378.
  • 9James K. Hammitt, Nicolas Treich, 2007, Statistical vs. identified lives in benefit-cost analysis, J Risk Uncertainty, No.35, pp.45-66.
  • 10Turner, Poppy, 2002, Is the PSC an objective assessment? Public Private Finance.

共引文献101

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部