棱镜中的所有权问题——重新解读马克思对“批判的蒲鲁东”所作的批判

the Chinese New Poetry; festival; experience——Reinterpretation on Marx's Critique of "Critical Proudhon"

在破解所有权的"斯芬克斯之谜"时,蒲鲁东主张重塑正义这一超越历史和现实之外的普遍法则来规范社会秩序和引导社会发展,因为作为一切社会流弊总和的所有权的存在,恰恰表明社会自身无法解决它。埃德加·鲍威尔却认为蒲鲁东没有认清贫困与所有权在整体上的内在统一性与存在的合理性,只是站在维护无产者利益的立场上空喊正义、平等的口号。在肯定蒲鲁东所有权批判的革命性意义和批判鲍威尔曲解蒲鲁东本意的同时,马克思指出作为所有权现实形态的私有财产导致了人的自我异化,只有通过变革现实的共产主义运动才能实现私有财产的积极扬弃。

When he cracked the ＂ Sphinx＇s riddle＂ of property,Proudhon tried to re-interpret the surreal and trans-historical principle of justice so that the society could work and develop normally. Because as the sum of social abuses,the existence of property indicates that the society can＇t resolve them itself. In Edgar Bauer＇s opinion,Proudhon didn＇t realize the organic whole of the poverty and the property,and the rationality of their existences. He thought that Proudhon was on the stand of proletariats to do an empty talk about justice and equality. But Marx confirmed the revolutionary significance of Proudhon＇s critique of the property,and thought that Edgar Bauer had distorted Proudhon＇s original sense. Meanwhile,Marx pointed out that the private property（ as an actual formation of the property） caused the self-alienation of man,and that positive sublation of the private property only comes through communist movement.