期刊文献+

单层球面网壳考虑一致倒塌概率的倒塌安全储备分析 被引量:3

COLLAPSE SAFETY MARGIN ANALYSIS OF SINGLE-LAYER SPHERICAL LATTICE SHELLS CONSIDERING CONSISTENT COLLAPSE PROBABILITY
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了考虑一致倒塌概率的单层球面网壳结构倒塌安全储备计算方法。以标准正态分布作为倒塌概率密度函数,采用指数型分布函数描述地震危险性,在假定网壳结构特大震倒塌率限值为10%的情况下,将两者积分得到了适用其50年内一致倒塌概率限值为0.46%,低于针对普通房屋建筑结构50年内一致倒塌概率1%的限值。在定义网壳结构特大地震强度水平的基础上,引入一致倒塌概率对其进行了修正。根据修正特大震强度,最终提出了针对网壳结构的倒塌安全储备系数(CMR)计算方法,这种做法可以使所做的抗倒塌设计更好地考虑到所有超越概率地震动水平,保证各抗震设防烈度下大跨网壳结构具备统一的倒塌概率限值要求。另外,通过谱形状参数对建议的倒塌安全储备计算结果进行了谱修正。针对三个算例网壳的增量动力分析对比了不同矢跨比和不同结构类型对倒塌安全储备以及50年倒塌概率的影响,三个算例结构均能满足倒塌概率限值的要求,50年倒塌概率与倒塌安全储备有较好的一致性。 A method is proposed to evaluate the collapse safety margin of single-layer lattice shells with the consideration of consistent collapse probability. With the assumed standard normal distribution for a collapse probability density function and the assumed exponential distribution for a seismic hazard function, the limit of 0.46% of 50-year consistent collapse probability for lattice shells is acquired through the integration of the two functions with a presumed collapse probability of 10% under major earthquakes. This limit is much lower than that suggested for ordinary building structures, i.e. 1%. The consistent collapse probability of large-span lattice shells is introduced to amend the pre-defined intensity of major earthquakes for large-span lattice shells. A new analytical method is proposed for the determination of the collapse margin ratio of lattice shells based on the amended intensity. The collapse resistance design combined with this method can account for earthquakeintensities with various probabilities of exceedance, making lattice shells have a unified limit of collapse probability with different seismic fortification intensities. Spectral correction is also carried out through spectral parameters in the final determination of collapse safety margin. The incremental dynamic analysis performed on three example single-layer spherical lattice shells is used to analyze the influence of a rise-span ratio and a structural system on collapse safety margin and 50-year collapse probability. All shells meet the requirement of the limit of 50-year consistent collapse probability. Consistency can be observed between collapse safety margin and 50-year collapse probability.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期218-225,共8页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(91315301 51261120376) 辽宁省自然科学基金项目(201202040)
关键词 大跨空间网壳结构 地震 一致倒塌概率 倒塌安全储备 反应谱修正 增量动力分析 OPEN SEES large-span lattice shell earthquake consistent collapse probability collapse safety margin spectralcorrection incremental dynamic analysis OpenSees
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1AISC.Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings[S].Chicago:American Institute of Steel Construction,Illinois,USA,2002.
  • 2Bernal D.Instability of buildings subjected to earthquakes[J].ASCE,Journal of Structural Engineering,1992,118(8):2239―2260.
  • 3陆新征,张万开,柳国环.基于推覆分析的RC框架地震倒塌易损性预测[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(4):1-6. 被引量:15
  • 4Jorge L A,Luis E.Seismic reliability functions for multi-storey frame and wall-frame systems[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2006,35(15):1899―1924.
  • 5Vamvatsikos D,Cornell C A.Incremental dynamic analysis[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2002,31(3):491―514.
  • 6Farzin Z,Helmut K.Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2007,36(13):1901―1914.
  • 7FEMA-P695.Quantification of building seismic performance factors[R].Redwood City:Applied Technology Council,California,USA,2009.
  • 8王亚勇,高孟潭,叶列平,等.基于大震和特大震下倒塌率目标的建筑抗震设计方法研究方案[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2010,32(Sup.2):291-297.
  • 9Luco N,Ellingwood B R,Hamburger R O,Hooper J D,Kimball J K,Kircher C A.Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States[C]//Proceedings of the SEAOC 76th Annual Convention.Structural Engineers Association of California,Sacramento,California,2007:1―13.
  • 10FEMA-P750.NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures[R].Washington D C:Building Seismic Safety Council,USA,2009.

二级参考文献48

  • 1吕大刚,于晓辉,王光远.基于MVFOSM有限元可靠度方法的结构整体概率抗震能力分析[J].世界地震工程,2008,24(2):1-8. 被引量:12
  • 2闫维明,王卓,何浩祥.空间结构模态局部化和跃迁现象及分析[J].北京工业大学学报,2009,35(12):1624-1629. 被引量:6
  • 3郭小康,李国强,刘玉姝,陈桥生.FEMA P695-Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors简介[J].建筑钢结构进展,2013,15(2):57-64. 被引量:11
  • 4蒋友宝,冯健,孟少平.结构损伤识别中模态跃迁的研究[J].工程力学,2006,23(6):35-40. 被引量:13
  • 5[1]Cornell C A,Krawinkler H.Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment[J].PEER Center News,2000,3(2):1-4.
  • 6[2]Moehle J,Deierlein G G.A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering[C].Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Vancouver,Canada,1-6 August,2004 (CD-ROM).
  • 7[3]Gardoni P,Der Kiureghian A,Mosalam K M.Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,2002,128(10):1024-1038.
  • 8[4]Zhou J H,Nowak A S.Integration formulas to evaluate functions of random variables[J].Structural Safety,1988,5(4):267-284.
  • 9[5]Baker J W,Cornell C A.Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM method[R].PEER Report 2003/07,University of California,Berkeley,California,2003.
  • 10[6]Hohenbichler M,Rackwitz R.Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,1981,107(6):1227-1238.

共引文献172

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部