期刊文献+

国有企业仍应是中国矿业“走出去”的重要力量 被引量:2

State-Owned Enterprises Should Still Play an Important Role in the “Going Out” of China's Mining Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文分析指出国有企业是在全球范围内普遍存在的,且发达国家的国有企业也进行了大量的跨国投资,具体到矿业领域也是如此。发展中国家国有矿业企业的产生、持续存在与发展有其历史与现实基础,是发展中国家的理性选择。当前,针对国有企业海外投资的"所有制歧视"并非国外投资审查的主流,且中国国有企业的改革方向符合海外矿业投资的要求。因此,国有企业仍应是中国矿业"走出去"的重要力量。为进一步支持国有矿业企业"走出去",中国需软化"竞争中立"约束,化解针对中国的"所有制歧视"倾向,完善中国企业海外矿业投资支持体系,并加速推进国有矿业企业的市场化改革。 In this paper, it is pointed out that the state-owned enterprises are widespread in the world, and the state- owned enterprises in the developed countries also have a lot of transnational investment, which is also the reality in the field of mining. The development of state-owned mining enterprises in developing countries has its historical and realistic foundation, which is the rational choice of developing countries. At present, the "Ownership Discrimination" is not the mainstream of foreign investment review, and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China is in line with the requirements of overseas mining investment. Therefore, the state-owned enterprises should still play an important role in the "Going Out" of China's mining industry. To further support the state-owned mining enterprises' "Going Out", China needs to soften the "Com aimed at China, improve petl the tire Neutrality" constraint, resolve the "Ownership Discrimination" tendency specifically overseas mining investment support system and accelerate the market-oriented reform of state-owned mining enterprises.
出处 《国土资源情报》 2016年第9期67-73,共7页 Land and Resources Information
基金 "国土资源部信息化运行与维护项目:资源全球治理动态跟踪与研究"课题的阶段性成果
关键词 国有企业 矿业 走出去 外国投资审查 竞争中立 所有制歧视 State-owned enterprises Mining industry Going Out Foreign investment review Competitive Neutrality Ownership Discrimination
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献54

  • 1孙强.英日外资并购安全审查制度及其对中方的启示[J].中国商界,2010(4):365-366. 被引量:6
  • 2中国已成为加拿大最大的海外投资来源国[N/OL].中国新闻网.2013-09-21.http://finance.chinanews.com/cj/2013/09-21/5304037.shtml.
  • 3国有企业新规则--它们是否取得适当的平衡[R].Osier Hoskin&Harcourt LL.2012-12-09.
  • 4LAWRENCE L. HERMAN. Investment review in Canada-we can do better[R]. The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 2011,4(10).
  • 5CHRIS MARGISON, JOHN BODRUG. Foreign investment review in Canada,The new rules[R/OL]. American Lawyer.http:// www.dwpv.com/-/media/Files/PDF/Lexpert_Foreign_Investment_ Review.ashx.
  • 6OLIVER J. BORGERS. Investment Canada Act: Minister of Industry Blocks Acquisition of MDA by Alliant Techsystems[R/0L].2010-05-12 http://www.mccarthy.ca/article_detail. aspx?id=3996.
  • 7MARK KATZ, ERIKA DOUGLAS. Canadian government reaches settlement with U.S. Steel in Investment Canada Act proceeding[R/ OL].2011-12- 13.http://www.dwpv.com/en/Resources/ Publicatiotts/2011/Canadian-Government-Reaches-Settlement- with-US-Steel-in-Investment-Canada-Act-Proceedings.
  • 8MICHAEL GRANT. Fear the dragon? Chinese foreign direct investment in Canada[R/OL]. 2012-06. http://www.casselsbrock. com.cn/files/file/docs/FearTheDragon.pdf.
  • 9DANIEL TENCER.Nexen CNOOC deal: poll finds 8 in 10 don't want foreign governments owning Canadian resources[N/OL]. 2012-10-16.http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/10/16/nexen- cnooc-deal-pol_ n_1971189.html.
  • 10Hennig, J., Obama administration looks to dismiss CFIUS lawsuit brought by Rails. Inside US-China Trade, 2012.

共引文献20

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部