集束化干预在内镜治疗癌症患者中的应用

Application of Cluster Intervention in Endoscopic Treatment of Cancer Patients

目的研究集束化干预在内镜治疗癌症患者中的应用效果。方法选择84例癌症患者,按随机数字表分为两组,即常规组42例和治疗组42例。常规组采用常规治疗干预,治疗组采用集束化干预治疗干预。结果常规组脱管2例、皮肤感染3例、消化道不良反应4例;治疗组脱管1例、皮肤感染2例、消化道不良反应1例;常规组注射点出血3例、异位栓塞4例、肝功能衰竭1例、迟发性出血3例;治疗组注射点出血1例、异位栓塞2例、肝功能衰竭1例、迟发性出血2例,常规组总不良反应发生率(47.6%)显著高于治疗组总不良反应发生率(23.8%),P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。治疗组有效率(73.8%)显著高于常规组(54.8%),P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论采用集束化干预在内镜治疗癌症患者中的应用疗效比常规治疗疗效更显著。

Objective To study the effect of cluster intervention in the endoscopic treatment of cancer patients.Methods84 cancer patients were selected,according to the random number table were divided into 2 groups,the conventional group（42 cases） and the treatment group（42 cases）.The conventional group received routine care,the treatment group received cluster nursing intervention treatment.Results In the conventional group,take off the tube was 2 cases,skin infection 3 cases,gastrointestinal adverse reactions 4 cases; in the treatment group,take off the tube was 1 case,skin infection 2 cases,gastrointestinal adverse reactions 1 case; In the conventional group,conventional injection point hemorrhage was 3 cases,ectopic embolism 4 cases,liver failure 1 case,late-onset hemorrhage 3 cases; in the treatment group,injection point bleeding was 1 case,ectopic embolism 2 cases,liver failure 1 case,late-onset hemorrhage 2 cases; total incidence of adverse reactions of the conventional group（47.6%）was significantly higher than that of the treatment group（23.8%）,P〈0.05,the difference was statistically significant.The effective rate of the treatment group（73.8%） was significantly higher than that of the conventional group（54.8%）,P〈0.05,and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Cluster intervention in the endoscopic treatment of cancer patients has more significant efficacy than the conventional treatment.