卵巢冠囊肿穿刺介入治疗与腹腔镜治疗的疗效观察对比

Comparison of curative effects between interventional treatment and laparoscopic treatment of parovarian cyst

目的:观察对比穿刺介入治疗与腹腔镜治疗卵巢冠囊肿的临床疗效。方法:选取本院诊断治疗的89例卵巢冠囊肿患者,分别接受腹腔镜治疗(51例)和穿刺介入治疗(38例),比较两种治疗方法的治疗效果、手术时间、术后感染和恢复情况等。结果:通过对两组手术情况进行对比,得出以下结果,两种治疗方法的治愈率和复发率没有显著性的差异(P>0.05)。腹腔镜治疗的手术时间、住院时间以及医疗费用基本上都是穿刺介入治疗的2倍,而且腹腔镜治疗的术后不良反应发生率为34.85%,穿刺介入治疗的为8.12%,存在着显著性的差异(P=0.006)。结论:与腹腔镜治疗相比,穿刺介入治疗的手术时间、住院时间和医疗费用更低,术后不良反应的发生率也显著低于腹腔镜治疗。

Objective： To observe the clinical effect between the interventional treatment and the laparoscopic treatment of parovarian cyst. Methods： Eighty-nine patients with parovarian cyst were treated with laparoscopic treatment（51 cases） and intervention treatment （38 eases） in our hospital. The curative effect, operative time, postoperative infection and recovery were compared between the two treatment methods. Results： The following results were obtained by comparing the operation condition of two groups. The cure rate and the recurrence rate of two treatments had no significant differences （P〉0.05）. The operative time and length of hospital stay and health care costs of laparoscopie treatment were basically two times of that of targeted interventional treatment. The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions of laparoscopic treatment was 34.85%, and the interventional therapy was 8.12%, there was a significant difference（P=0.006）. Conclusion： Compared with laparoscopic treatment, the operation time, hospitalization time, health care costs of interventional treatment were lower, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was significantly lower than that of laparoscopic treatment.