期刊文献+

KRAS基因检测干预西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本-效果探讨 被引量:6

Investigation on cost-effectiveness of cetuximab treatment against metastatic colorectal cancer by KRASgene intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过评价KRAS基因检测用于西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌(metastatic colorectal cancer,mCRC)的国内外药物经济学研究,探讨其临床疗效及成本效果。方法:从Pubmed、CNKI等大型数据库对2006—2016年期间国内外公开发表的有关KRAS基因检测干预西妥昔单抗治疗的药物经济学评价文献进行检索,对研究内容及结果进行分析及综述。结果:纳入分析的7篇文献表明,与西妥昔单抗(无KRAS检测)相比,KRAS基因检测干预西妥昔单抗治疗mCRC可显著降低成本或提高质量调整生命年(quality adjusted life year,QALY),改善成本效果,具有优势;且额外进行BRAF及RAS基因检测可进一步改善KRAS检测干预西妥昔单抗治疗的成本效果。结论:KRAS等基因突变检测干预西妥昔单抗治疗相比无KRAS检测为具有优势,且对于指导西妥昔单抗治疗方案的合理选择及实现肿瘤精准医疗有重大实践意义,或将成为未来肿瘤学研究趋势。 OBJECTIVE To discuss cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of Kirsten ras oncogene(KRAS)intervention through comprehensive assessment of KRASintervention in cetuximab treatment against metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).METHODS English and Chinese literatures about economic evaluations of cetuximab treatment of mCRC patients under KRAS gene intervention were systemically researched in databases of PubMed and CNKI.RESULTS According to seven literatures analyzed,compared with cetuximab treatment without KRASgene mutation testing,cost decreased or quality adjusted life year(QALY)increased after KRASgene intervention was added into cetuximab treatment.Testing of BRAFand RASgene could further improve cost-effectiveness of cetuximab treatment in mCRC patients under KRASgene intervention.CONCLUSIONApplication of KRASgene intervention prior to treatment with cetuximab is found to be more economically favorable,and has great practical significance in reasonable selection of cetuximab treatment and the realization of precision medicine against cancer.It might develop into the mainstream of oncology researches in future.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第19期1697-1701,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81173028)
关键词 西妥昔单抗 KRAS基因 转移性结直肠癌 成本-效果 cetuximab KRAS gene metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Waddell T, Gollins S, Soe W, et al. Phase II study of short- course capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) followed by ma- intenance capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: XelQuali study[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2011,67 ( 5 ) : 1111- 1117.
  • 2Lubner SJ, Loconte NK, Holen KD, et al. phase II study of ox aliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and high-dose eapecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer,2010,9(3) : 157-161.
  • 3Ramani VS, Sun Myint A, Montazeri A, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparison between in- travenous 5-fluorouracil and oral capecitabine [J]. Colorectal Dis,2010,12(Suppl 2):37-46.
  • 4钟俊勇.FOLFOX4与XELOX方案治疗晚期大肠癌临床疗效观察[J].中外健康文摘,2012,9(20):61-62.
  • 5Rebecca Siegel,Deepa Naishadham,Ahmedin Jemal.Cancer statistics, 2013[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2013 (1)
  • 6Julian P T Higgins,Simon G Thompson,Jonathan J Deeks,Douglas G Altman.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal . 2003
  • 7Matthias Egger,George Davey Smith,Martin Schneider,Christoph Minder.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal . 1997
  • 8J. Sastre,E. Aranda,C. Grávalos,B. Massutí,M. Varella-Garcia,F. Rivera,G. Soler,A. Carrato,J.L. Manzano,E. Díaz-Rubio,M. Hidalgo.First-line single-agent cetuximab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A phase II clinical and molecular study of the Spanish group for digestive tumor therapy (TTD)[J].Critical Reviews in Oncology and Hematology.2009(1)
  • 9Amado Rafael G,Wolf Michael,Peeters Marc,Van Cutsem Eric,Siena Salvatore,Freeman Daniel J,Juan Todd,Sikorski Robert,Suggs Sid,Radinsky Robert,Patterson Scott D,Chang David D.Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology . 2008
  • 10C. Bokemeyer,I. Bondarenko,J. T. Hartmann.Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Annals of Oncology . 2011

共引文献12

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部