预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复应用的临床对比

Application of prefabricated fiber post and plastic fiber post in prosthodontics

目的对比分析预成纤维桩与可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中应用的安全性及临床效果。方法选取我科收治的桩冠修复患者300例,随机分为观察组与对照组,各150例。其中,观察组采用预成纤维桩进行修复,而对照组则采用可塑纤维桩进行修复,对比分析两组的临床修复效果,包括修复成功率、每棵纤维桩安装所需时间以及患者满意度。结果观察组修复成功率为98.7%,高于对照组的80.0%(P<0.01);两组每棵纤维桩安装时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但观察组患者满意度为97.3%,显著高于对照组的75.3%(P<0.01)。两组均无明显不良反应。结论与可塑纤维桩相比,预成纤维桩能够提升桩冠修复的成功率,并可提高患者满意率,有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective To compare and analyze the safety and clinical effects of prefabricated fiber post and plastic fiber post applied in prosthodontics. Methods A total of 300 patients admitted to our department for prosthodontical treatment were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group （n = 150, respectively）. Prefabricated fiber post and plastic fiber post were applied in the observation group and the control group respectively to compare and analyze the clinical effects in the two groups, including the success rate of prosthodontics, the time required for the installation of each fiber post and the satisfaction of patients. Results The success rate in the observation group was 98.7%, which was higher than that （80.0%） in the control group （P 〈 0.01）; the difference in the time required for installing each fiber post between the two groups had no statistical significance（P 〉 0.05）; the satisfaction of patients in the observation group was 97.3%, which was much higher than that （75.3%） in the control group （P 〈 0.01）. There was no adverse reaction in the two groups. Conclusion The success rate of prosthodontics with prefabricated fiber post is higher than that with plastic fiber post, so the patients are more satisfied with prefabricated fiber post. Prefabricated fiber post has higher clinical application value.