非法证据排除规则适用的相关问题分析——以2014年160份裁判文书为分析样本

Some Issues on Application of the Excusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence——Studying 160 Test Cases in 2014 as Sample Analysis

2012年修改的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》在国家的基本法层面较为完整的确立了我国的非法证据排除规则。然而,法律的颁布并不等于法律的实施,非法证据排除规则在实践中能否产生满意的效果仍有待观察。现以2014年的160份裁判文书为分析样本,从裁判文书在不同地区、案件类型和审理程序的分布上、申请排除的证据类型、公诉机关的证明方法、法院的裁判结果和理由等方面对该规则的适用进行分析和反思。并从完善立法、建立健全相关配套制度、改革司法体制等方面提出有关建议,以期为非法证据排除规则的进一步完善有所裨益。

The criminal procedure law of the people＇s Republic of China revised in 2012 estab-lished the China＇s illegal evidence exclusion rules with relatively complete law in the state of the bas-ic law . However, even if the illegal evidence exclusion rule of the content is more standardized, but the reality of the “illegal evidence” is still not optimistic. In 2014,the 160 part of the paper is the analysis of the sample, from the judicial documents in different areas, the case type and the distri-bution of the proceedings, Type of evidence for application, the prosecution＇s certificate, the courts referee results and reasons to analysis and reflect the illegal evidence exclusion rules in the applica-tion .At the same time, giving some proposals and suggestions from, improving legislation, establis-hing and sounding the relevant systems, and reforming the judicial system and so on,in order to further improve the illegal evidence exclusion rules.