期刊文献+

包皮环切缝合器手术与包皮套环环扎手术的疗效对照 被引量:3

Compared the Efficacy of Circumcision Suture Surgery and Surgery Foreskin Cerclage Ring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比探讨包皮环切缝合器手术与包皮套环环扎手术的疗效。方法选择我科2013年7月-2016年10月期间收治的小儿包茎或包皮过长患儿共562例作为研究对象,随机分为对照组(182例)和观察组(380例)。观察组采用一次性包皮环切缝合器治疗,对照组采用包皮环环切术治疗,观察两组患者手术效果、术中、术后疼痛及并发症情况。结果观察组手术成功率(100%)显著高于对照组(94.09%),观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后24 h疼痛评分均显著少于对照组,观察组不良反应发生率(6.32%)显著低于对照组(11.54%),组间差异均显著P〈0.05。结论包皮环切缝合器手术疗效优于包皮套环环扎手术,更为安全可靠。 Objective The curative effect comparison of circumcision suture surgery and surgery foreskin cerclage ring. Methods Selection in our department from July 2013 to October 2016 were selected from children with phimosis or redundant prepuce in children with a total of 562 cases as the research object,randomly divided into control group( 182 cases)and observation group( 380 cases). The observation group using disposable circumcision suture treatment,the control group using prepuce ring resection in the treatment of patients,observe the operation effect,two postoperative pain and complications. Results The observation group operation success rate( 100%) was significantly higher than the control group( 94. 09%),observation group operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative 24 h pain scores were significantly less than the control group,the adverse reaction rate of observation group( 6. 32%) was significantly lower than the control group( 11. 54%),the differences between groups were significantly P〈0.05. Conclusion Ircumcision surgery suture is better than that of ring foreskin cerclage surgery,more safe and reliable.
机构地区 中山市人民医院
出处 《现代医院》 2016年第10期1445-1446,1449,共3页 Modern Hospitals
关键词 包皮过长 包茎 包皮环环切术 一次性包皮环切缝合器 Prepuce phimosis foreskin ring Resection Disposable circumcision suture device
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献79

共引文献72

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部