摘要
AIM:To investigate the clinical outcomes of different intubation techniques in the cases of failed primary probing.METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on338 patients with the diagnosis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with age 1-4y that had failed primary probing.Intubation was performed under light sedation in operating room and the stent was left 3mo in place.Clinical outcome was investigated 3mo after tube removal.RESULTS: Bicanalicular intubation method had higher complete and relative success rates compared to monocanalicular intubation(P =0.00).In addition,Monoka intubation had better outcomes compared to Masterka technique(P =0.046).No difference was found between genders but the higher the age,the better the outcomes with bicanalicular technique rather than monocanalicular.CONCLUSION: Overall success rate of bicanalicular intubation is superior to monocanalicular technique especially in older ages.Also,based upon our clinical outcomes,Masterka intubation is not recommended in cases of failed probing.
AIM:To investigate the clinical outcomes of different intubation techniques in the cases of failed primary probing.METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on338 patients with the diagnosis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with age 1-4y that had failed primary probing.Intubation was performed under light sedation in operating room and the stent was left 3mo in place.Clinical outcome was investigated 3mo after tube removal.RESULTS: Bicanalicular intubation method had higher complete and relative success rates compared to monocanalicular intubation(P =0.00).In addition,Monoka intubation had better outcomes compared to Masterka technique(P =0.046).No difference was found between genders but the higher the age,the better the outcomes with bicanalicular technique rather than monocanalicular.CONCLUSION: Overall success rate of bicanalicular intubation is superior to monocanalicular technique especially in older ages.Also,based upon our clinical outcomes,Masterka intubation is not recommended in cases of failed probing.