摘要
非法证据排除规则适用过程中,排除难依旧是检法共同面临的一大困境。实践中排除难包括非法证据合法地不被排除和被排除的非法证据仍影响法官心证两种情形。规则内在缺陷、侦查封闭性、一元化法庭的弊端是排除难的制度原因。司法不独立、公检法间利益纠葛是排除难的体制原因。法意识形态不匹配是排除难的观念因素。当前非法证据排除难的出路破解重在完善制度本身设计、优化刑事司法权力配置和实现法意识形态的转型。
It is a dilemma faced by procuratorate and court in the application of illegal evidence exclusion rule. The difficulty includes that illegal evidences are not excluded and excluded illegal evidences still influence the jud- ges . The internal defects of rules, the closeness of investigation, the disadvantages of the unified court are the insti- tutional reasons of the difficulty of elimination. Judicial nonindependence and interest disputes between the procura- torate and court are the systematic reasons. The mismatch of law ideology is the idealistic reason of the difficulty of elimination. Currently, the keys of the cracking way in the application of illegal evidence exclusion rule are perfec- ting the system itself, optimizing the allocation of criminal judicial power and achieving the transition of ideology.
作者
潘金贵
蔡岱燐
PAN Jin - gui CAI Dai - lin(Law school of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2016年第4期73-78,共6页
Journal of Henan Police College
关键词
非法证据排除
刑事司法权力配置
裁判文书说理
elimination of illegal evidence
allocation of criminal judiciary power
reason giving of judgement document