民法典的理性与知识产权法

The Rationality of Civil Code and Intellectual Property Law

引言 知识产权法与民法典的关系曾经是我国法学界关注的焦点问题之一,围绕知识产权法是否应当纳入民法典这一问题,我国民法学界和知识产权法学界曾经展开了热烈的讨论。可惜的是,这场论争并未持续多久便＂草率收兵＂：多数知识产权法学者仍然主张知识产权法应当入典,而民法学者仍坚持反对态度,谁也拿不出令对方真正信服的理据。因此,这一问题仍然是悬而未决的。

The unity of formal rationality and substance rationality of the civil code can be realized by the autonomy of private law. The formal rationality of the civil code requires the logical and systematic arrangement of the norms, in order to maintain the autonomy of the civil code and the traditional advantages of the 'system neutrality'. The rational coordination of the relationship between autonomy and regulation must be carried out by constructing the 'pure civil code' to implement the principle of private law autonomy, and to achieve the goal of regulation by a single law. The unique characteristics of 'person', 'right' and 'standard constitution' in the intellectual property law have the inherent conflict with the formal rationality and the substantive rationality of the civil code. Therefore, the intellectual property law should not be included in the civil code, but should keep the legislative model of single law.