摘要
一、引言
2012年《刑事诉讼法》再次修改时增设"庭前会议"制度[1],立法初衷是"在控辩双方的同时参与下,法官就案件程序问题集中听取意见的制度,有利于明确庭审重点、提高庭审效率、保证庭审质量。"[2]然而,一款篇幅(《刑事诉讼法》第182条中第2款)的规定只能粗略勾勒庭前会议的基本框架,粗放型立法模式使得该制度缺乏系统闭合性与可操作性。
On promoting proceeding system with trial as focus, pretrial meeting system shall be positioned and recognized in the overall situation under the criminal trial proceedings with institutional thoughts. About functions, the court shall clarify the processes division in pretrial meeting, submission of evidence, conflicting point summarization, incidental civil actions and criminal reconciliation. About the procedural effect, the pretrial meeting in the sense of norm presents in its practical state of 'discussion and negotiation mode', and exists with some defects of 'centralism of the trial'. Reform proposal shall combine with the practical measures of promoting 'focus on trial', drive pretrial meeting from negotiation to adjudication and build up the proceeding structure of pretrial meeting.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2016年第5期125-134,161,共10页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"刑事庭审实质化研究"(15AFX015)阶段性成果
中国政法大学优秀中青年教师支持计划和青年教师学术创新团队项目资助