摘要
目的:在大学生群体中引入注意相关认知错误量表,探讨该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构,并检验其信效度。方法:在大学生群体中发放问卷1100份,回收有效问卷964份,另用无聊倾向量表、正念注意觉知量表和心智游移问卷作为效标,3周后随机抽取117名学生进行重测。结果:探索性因素分析表明,抽取2个因素最为合适,特征根为4.808和1.004,累积方差贡献率为52.836%。验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ2/df=1.912,CFI=0.969,TLI=0.959,RMSEA=0.053,SRMR=0.040);总量表及2个分量表内部一致性信度在0.689-0.866之间,重测信度在0.643-0.859之间;量表具有较好的效标关联效度。结论:注意相关认知错误量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于大学生的注意相关认知错误测量。
Objective: To introduce and measure the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Attention-related Cognitive Errors Seale(ARCES). Methods: 1100 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of ARC- ES. At the same time, the Boredom Proneness Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and Mind-Wandering Question- naire were used as the criterion. 117 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of ARCES three weeks after the first investigation. Results: The exploratory factor analysis showed that ARCES consisted of two factor, accounting for 52.836% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis identified a double factor model. CFI=0.969, TLI=0.959, RMSEA=O.053, SRMR=0.040. Reliability coefficients of the two dimensions and total score ranged from 0.689 to 0.866, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.643 to 0.859. The ARCES was of good criterion validity as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of ARCES can be used as an effective instrument to assess the attention-related cognitive errors in Chi- nese university students.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第5期874-877,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词
注意相关认知错误
大学生
信度
效度
Attention-related cognitive errors
University students
Reliability
Validity