摘要
《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》(GB50500-2013)中有强制性条文15条,这些强制性条文并非都属于标准化法及其实施条例规定的强制性标准范畴,违反这些强制性条文签订的合同条款也并不都发生无效的法律后果。本文在研究该计价规范法律性质的基础上,对其中所有强制性条文的效力进行类型化分析。这对于妥善解决司法实践中所涉及的《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》强制性条文争议具有重要意义。
There are 15 compulsive provisions in Code of Valuation with Bill Quantity of Construction Works (GB50500-2013). But not all of these provisions are mandatory standard defined in Standardization Law and Regulation on the Implementation of the Standardization Law. It also means not all of the contract clauses which violate these provisions are invalid. We try to categorize the force of law of these compulsive provisions based on research to the legal nature of Code of Valuation with Bill Quantity of Construction Works. we believe it will be helpful to resolve the disputes of compulsive provisions in Code of Valuation with Bill Quantity of Construction Works taken place in juridical practice involved.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2016年第2期43-50,共8页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
基金
中国建筑科学研究院自筹基金项目“建筑企业法律风险管理研究”的阶段性研究成果之一
关键词
建设工程
工程量清单计价规范
强制性条文
效力
类型化
construction work
Code of Valuation with Bill Quantity
compulsive provisions
force of law
categorization