期刊文献+

不完全信息下军事威逼讨价还价博弈分析

Game Theoretical Analysis of Military Compellence Bargaining Process with Incomplete Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在详细分析威慑与威逼区别的基础上,构建了不完全信息下军事威逼讨价还价博弈模型。按照最大期望效用准则,分析了不完全信息下军事威逼走向讨价还价阶段的条件,研究表明:运用鲁宾斯坦经典讨价还价唯一完美均衡解,得出以下结论:争夺目标自身的效用越大,战争带来的声誉得益效用越大,军事威逼走向讨价还价阶段的可能性越大;一旦进入讨价还价阶段,威逼者会接受挑战者提出的方案,冲突将不再发生。 The meanings of deterrence and compellence are distinguished. And then a military compellence bargaining model with incomplete information is advanced. According to the expected utility maximization criterion the condition of military compellence to bargaining game is yielded. With Rubinstein bargaining equilibrium the following conclusions are obtained. The larger the target avail which is contested is,the larger the report avail which is obtained by the war is,the larger the probability that the players go into bargaining process is. Once the players go into bargaining process the conflict will not occur any more and the defender will accept the project that the challenger advanced.
机构地区 火箭军指挥学院
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期55-58,共4页 Fire Control & Command Control
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51409258)
关键词 军事威逼 讨价还价博弈 不完全信息 military compellence bargaining game incomplete information
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1王缉思,徐辉.中美危机行为比较分析[J].美国研究,2005,19(2):22-46. 被引量:23
  • 2Thomas Sehelling. Arms and influence[ M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966. 120-123.
  • 3Nash J F. The bargaining problem[J]. Econometrica, 1950, 18: 155-162.
  • 4Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 97-109.
  • 5John Harsanyi. Games with incomplete information played by "bayesian" players, parts Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ[ J]. Management Science, 1967 - 1968, 14: 159-182, 320-334, 486-502.
  • 6Thomas Schelling, Arms and Influence[ M ]. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1966.69-91.
  • 7Alexander L. George. Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to Wa [ M ]. Washington: Institute of Peace Press, 1991, "Preface".
  • 8Peter Viggo Jakobsen. Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy After the Cold War: a challenge for theory and practice [ M ]. New York : St. Martin's Press, 1998.2-3.
  • 9[美]朱·弗登博格,[法]让·梯若尔.《博弈论》[M].黄涛等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,287.
  • 10张曙光.威慑理论:美国国际战略学的一个重要领域[J]美国研究,1990(04).

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部