摘要
[目的]对行为评估量表(The Face,Legs,Activity,Cry,Consolability Behavioral Scale,FLACC)进行信度和效度评价,探讨该量表对成人危重病人疼痛评估的应用价值。[方法]选取2015年1月—5月在某三级甲等医院重症监护病房住院的30例病人为研究对象。在非疼痛性操作前、操作后和疼痛性操作前、操作后采用FLACC量表对病人进行疼痛评估。[结果]FLACC量表评定者间信度较好[(t=1.000,P=0.326)和(t=1.044,P=0.305)];量表总体Cronbach’sα系数为0.859和0.843;非疼痛性操作前、操作后和疼痛性操作前、操作后两次重复测量的整体相关系数分别为别0.995和0.962;5个条目内容效度(I-CVI)大于0.78,K值大于0.74;该量表共提取1个公因子,累计贡献率为55.901%。非疼痛性操作后和疼痛性操作后FLACC评分分别为(3.667±1.689)分和(5.033±1.731)分。[结论]FLACC量表在成人危重病人疼痛评估中具有较好的信度和效度。
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of behavior assessment scale(The Face,Legs,Activity,Cry,Consolability Behavioral Scale,FLACC)and probe into application value of the scale in the pain assessment in adult critically ill patients,Methods:A total of 30 cases of ICU patients were selected from January to May in 2015 in intensive care unit(ICU)in a third grade A cancer hospital.The FLACC scale was used for pain assessment of patients before and during non pain operation and pain operation.Results:Reliability and validity of FLACC scale were better(t=1.000,P=0.326)and(t=1.044,P=0.305);total alpha coefficients of the scale were 0.859 and 0.843;Integral correlation coefficient of twice repeated measurements before and after non pain operation and pain operation were respective 0.995 and 0.962;5items of content validity(I-CVI)was greater than 0.78,K value was greater than 0.74;common factor of the scale was extracted,the cumulative contribution rate was 55.901%.The FLACC score was respectively(3.667±1.689)and(5.033±1.731)after non-pain operation and pain operation.Conclusion:FLACC scale has better reliability and validity in the pain evaluation of adult critically ill patients.
出处
《护理研究(中旬版)》
2016年第11期3996-3999,共4页
Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金
山东省高校社科计划项目
编号:J09WJ08
关键词
行为评估量表
成人
危重病人
疼痛评估
信度
效度
Behavior Assessment Scale
adult
critically ill patient
pain assessment
reliability
validity