1Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents [ M ]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.56.
2Burke P F, Reitzig M. Measuring patent assessmentquality: analyzing the degree and kind of (In) consis- tency in patent offices" decision making [ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9) : 1404 - 1430.
3Combeau J. Patent Quality [ EB/OL]. Available at www. ficpi, org/library/07 AmsterdamColloqu/5 - Combeau_revised. pdf. 2011 - 06 - 21.
4Paul H J, Alfons, P, Elizabeth W. Misclassification in patent offices [ J]. Intellectual Property Research Insti- tute of Australia Working Paper, 2008, No. 02/08.
5Lemley M A. Rational ignorance at the patent Office [J]. Northeastern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4) :1495 - 1523.
6Palangkaraya A, Jensen P H,Webster E. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes [ R ]. Intel- lectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper, 2005, No. 09/05.
7Quillen Jr, C D,Webster O H. Continuing patent appli- cations and performance of the U.S. patent office [ J ]. The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 2001, 11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
8Jensen P H,Webster E M. Factors affecting the power of patent rights [ R]. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Re- search Institute of Australia (IPRIA) , Working Paper, 2004, No. 31/04.
9Gallini N T. The economics of patents: lessons from re- cent U. S. Patent Reform [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 ( 2 ) : 131 - 154.
10Gaetan R, Bruno P. On the price elasticity of demand for patents [ J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statis- tics, 2011, 4 May.
