1G.Moss, C. Jewitt,, R.Levaaic, V. Armstrong, A. Cardini, and F. Castle. The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge. Institute of Education, University of London. DfES/Becta, 2007.
2F.Sahan,, and K. Arslan, K. A New Teacher Tool, Interactive White Boards: A Meta Analysis. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of So- ciety for Information Techtlology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009. Chesapeake; VA: AACE, 2009.pp. 2115-2120.
3B. J. Fraser. Research on classroom and school climates. In D. Gabel(Ed.). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan, 1994,pp.493-541.
4B. J. Fraser. Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research,vol. 1, pp. 7-33.1998.
5I.Hall, and S. Higgins. Primary school students' perception of in- teractive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 21 (2), pp.102-117, 2005.
6K..Wall, S. Higgins, and H.J. Smith. The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Education Technolo- gy, Vol. 36(5), pp. 851-867, 2005.
7H. Smith. Smartboard evaluation final report. Kent NgfL.http://www. kented.org.uk/ngfl/whiteboards/report.html, 2001.
