摘要
为研究多塔矮塔斜拉桥主梁的破坏形式和抗弯极限承载力,以宁江松花江特大桥为背景工程,采用ANSYS软件,分别基于Drucker-Prager屈服准则和Willam-Warnke五参数破坏准则建立两种三维实体有限元模型,分析结构从承受设计荷载至破坏荷载整个过程的受力状态并得到3种工况下的结构抗弯极限承载力,和现行桥梁规范(JTG D62—2004)方法的计算值进行了对比.结果表明:两种有限元模型的抗弯极限承载力计算值相对规范方法计算值的平均误差分别为2.7%和6.5%,最大误差分别为5.9%和8.6%,有限元分析结果与规范方法计算值吻合较好;结构在活载系数小于3时基本处于弹性状态;中跨跨中加载为该桥安全系数最小的工况,其安全系数为2.08.
In order to investigate the failure modes and ultimate bearing capacity of the beam of multi-span extra- dosed bridges, by using ANSYS, two three-dimensional solid element models of the Ningjiang Songhua River Bridge are constructed respectively based on the five-parameter Willam-Warnke yield criteria and the Drucker-Prager yield criteria. Then, the entire load range of the bridge, which is from a design load to a failure load, is analyzed respec- tively by using the two models. Moreover, the corresponding ultimate bending bearing capacities for the two models under three kinds of conditions are obtained and are compared with the calculated values based on the current bridge code ( JTG D62-2004). The results show that ( 1 ) the average errors between the ultimate bearing capaci- ties of the two finite element models and the bridge code results are respectively 2.7% and 6.5% , and the corre- sponding maximum errors are 5.9% and 8.6%, which means that the results based on the two finite element too- dels accord well with the bridge code results; (2) the structure works at the to the designed live load is less than 3; and (3) the structure with the load elastic state when the ratio of the load on its midspan is of a minimum load safety factor of 2.08.
作者
胡世翔
黄侨
刘义河
HU Shi-xiang HUANG Qiao LIU Yi-he(School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China Jilin Communication Planning and Design Institute, Changchun 130021, Jilin, China)
出处
《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第8期114-122,共9页
Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51208096)~~
关键词
矮塔斜拉桥
极限承载力
非线性分析
屈服准则
全过程分析
extra-dosed bridge
ultimate bearing capacity
nonlinear analysis
yield criteria
full-range analysis