期刊文献+

一种DEA效率概率占优方法研究 被引量:2

A DEA efficiency probability dominance method
原文传递
导出
摘要 决策单元间的效率关系研究是效率研究中的重要领域.传统DEA模型通过计算决策单元各自最优权重情景下的效率最大值,来判断决策单元间的效率排序关系.而这种最优权重往往是极端权重,没有考虑其它权重情景.采用其它权重时,决策单元的效率值和排序往往会发生较大的变化.本文考虑了所有权重情景,提出了DEA效率概率占优模型,定义了决策单元的占优效率概率和被占优效率概率.该模型能够判断任意两个决策单元的效率概率占优关系;并将效率概率占优关系从两个决策单元扩展到决策单元与决策单元集.最后将其应用于决策单元效率排序.通过实证分析发现了两条重要结论:1)考虑所有权重情景的排序与采用极端权重的CCR效率值排序不一致;2)考虑所有权重情景时,一些无效单元的效率排序比有效单元的效率排序更高. The study of efficiency relationship among DMUs (decision making units, DMUs) is an important area in efficiency research. Traditional DEA model computes DMUs' maximum efficiency scores by optimal weights and uses the scores to rank DMUs. However the optimal weights always are ex- treme weights and the DEA model do not consider the other weights. When the other weights are used, DMUs' efficiency scores and ranking always are changed. This paper proposes a DEA efficiency probability dominance model and defines dominance efficiency probability considering all weights. This model can determine efficiency relationship between two DMUs and efficiency relationship between a DMU and a DMU set. Finally, we apply it to DMUs' efficiency ranking. Based on the application, we have two significant conclusions. One is that the rankings considering all weights is different from the rankings by CCR efficiency scores. Another is when considering all weights the rankings of some inefficient DMUs may be higher than the rankings of efficient DMUs.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期2641-2647,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71271196 71261003) 国家自然科学基金国际合作交流重大项目(71110107024) 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(61101219) 国家创新群体项目(71121061)
关键词 数据包络分析 效率概率占优 效率排序 data envelopment analysis efficiency probability dominance ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1刘寅东,李树范,唐焕文,李纪选.船型技术经济综合评判的DEA方法[J].大连理工大学学报,1995,35(6):873-878. 被引量:7
  • 2赵勇,岳超源,陈.数据包络分析中有效单元的进一步分析[J].系统工程学报,1995,10(4):95-100. 被引量:15
  • 3戴铁军,陆钟武.钢铁企业生态效率分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1168-1173. 被引量:72
  • 4戴铁军,陆钟武.钢铁生产流程铁资源效率的分析[J].钢铁,2006,41(6):77-82. 被引量:13
  • 5孙振清,赵秀生,刘滨,何建坤.钢铁生产环境影响的ECECA方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(9):1541-1544. 被引量:4
  • 6中国经济信息网研究团队.2009中国行业年度报告系列之钢铁[R].北京:中国经济信息网,2009.
  • 7Wei Y M, Liao H, Fan Y. LAn empirical analysis of energy ettieieney in China's iron and steel sector[J]. Energy, 2007, 32(12): 2262-2270.
  • 8Kim J W, Lee J Y, Kim J Y, et al. Sources of productive efficiency: International comparison of iron and steel firms[J]. Resources Policy, 2006, 31(4): 239-246.
  • 9Ma J L, Evans D G, Fulier R J, et al. Technical efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2002, 76(3): 293-312.
  • 10Van Caneghem J, Block C, Cramm P, et al. Improving eco-efficiency in the steel industry: The ArcelorMittal Gent case[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(8): 807-814.

共引文献93

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部