期刊文献+

包膜外切除术与浅叶切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤的比较研究 被引量:4

Comparison Between Extracapsular Dissection and Superficial Parotidectomy for the Treatment of Parotid Benign Tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较应用包膜外切除术与浅叶切除术治疗腮腺浅叶良性肿瘤的临床疗效。方法收集腮腺浅叶良性结节患者77例,47例行腮腺肿物包膜外切除术,30例行腮腺浅叶切除术。结果浅叶切除组的平均手术时间为(107.3±17.5)min,显著多于包膜外切除组的(71.5±13.5)min(P<0.05)。包膜外切除组的术后涎瘘、暂时性面瘫、口干和Frey's综合征发生率均显著低于浅叶切除组(P<0.05)。包膜外切除组患者暂时性面瘫恢复时间显著短于浅叶切除组(P<0.05)。两组复发率无显著差异。结论对于腮腺浅叶良性小结节患者,腮腺肿物包膜外完整切除术可以高效、安全地切除肿物,减少术后并发症的发生。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracapsular dissection and superficial parotidectomy for the treatment of parotid benign tumor. Methods 77 cases of patients with parotid benign tumor were selected, including 47 patients with extracapsular dissection and 30 patients with superficial parotidectomy. Results The average operation time of superficial parotidectomy group was (107.3 ± 17.5) min, significantly more than (71.5 ± 13.5)min of extracapsular dissection group (P〈0.05). The incidences of postoperative salivary fistula, temporary facial paralysis, mouth dryness and Frey's syndrome of extracapsular dissection group were significantly lower than those of superficial parotidectomy group (P 〈0.05). The recovery time of temporary facial paralysis of extracapsular dissection group was significantly shorter than that of superficial parotidectomy group (P 〈0.05). No statistical difference was found between two groups in the recurrence rate (P〉0.05). Conclusions Extracapsular dissection for patients with parotid benign tumor can remove tumor efficiently and safely, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2016年第10期1349-1350,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 腮腺 良性肿瘤 包膜外切除术 浅叶切除术 Parotid Benign tumor Extracapsular dissection Superficial parotidectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献59

共引文献60

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部