期刊文献+

疤痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的临床结局及可行性分析 被引量:71

Clinical observation and analysis of 53 cases of scar repregnancy with vaginal delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨疤痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的可行性和安全性。方法:回顾分析2014年1月至2015年6月本院产科458例疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩的临床资料。其中53例患者选择了经阴道分娩(观察组),随机选择疤痕子宫再妊娠后行剖宫产53例作为对照组,比较两组临床结局和母儿预后。结果:与对照组相比,观察组产时出血量较少(t=25.393,P=0.000)、住院时间短(t=4.358,P=0.039),产妇产后出血减少(χ2=3.975,P=0.046)、产褥感染发生率较低(χ2=6.360,P=0.012),差异均具有统计学意义。观察组与对照组比较,新生儿Apgar评分、新生儿体重、新生儿湿肺发生率无显著差异(t=2.971,P=0.088;t=3.756,P=0.055;χ2=3.087,P=0.079)。结论:在严格掌握适应症的前提下,疤痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩是可行的,有利于产后恢复。 Objective: To investigate feasibility and safety of scar term pregnancy with vaginal delivery. Methods: Retrospectively analyze 458 cases clinical data of scar repregnancy with vaginal delivery from January 2014 to June 2015 in which 53 patients chose vaginal delivery,as observation group,comparatively analyze 53 random cases( control group) of scar uterine cesarean section.The prognosis of two groups was compared. Results: Compared with the control group,the bleeding volume in observation group was reduced,shorter hospitalization time,maternal postpartum disease rate,endometritis,cureless incision rate was reduced,The difference was statistically significant( t = 25. 393,P = 0. 000; t = 4. 358,P = 0. 039; χ2= 3. 975,P = 0. 046; χ2= 6. 360,P = 0. 012). Compared with the control group the neonatal Apgar score,neonatal weight and neonatal wet lung had no statistical significance( t = 2. 971,P =0. 088; t = 3. 756,P = 0. 055; χ2= 3. 087,P = 0. 079). Conclusion: Scar repregnancy with vaginal delivery in strict control of indications is feasible and conducive to postpartum recovery.
出处 《川北医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第5期700-703,共4页 Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
关键词 疤痕子宫 再次妊娠 分娩方式 Scar uterus Pregnancy Delivery mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献77

  • 1张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:262
  • 2汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:8
  • 3朱世钗,金慧佩,朱世霞,赵雅萍,耿晓虹.剖宫产术后再次妊娠子宫局部疤痕愈合的超声评价[J].温州医学院学报,2006,36(4):394-395. 被引量:9
  • 4Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007- 2008[J]. Lan- cet, 2010,375 (9713) : 490-499.
  • 5Abstracts of the american college of obstetricians and gynecolo- gists 52nd annual clinical meeting, may 1-5,2004, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103 ( 4 Suppl) : 4s-143s.
  • 6Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Maternal complica- tions with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193(5) : 1656-1662.
  • 7Lydon-Ro chelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY. Brith after previous cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2010,34 (4) : 249-257.
  • 8Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean,long-term maternal outeomes[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2010,34(4) : 258-266.
  • 9Guise JM,Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after ce- sarean:new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010,115(6) : 1267-1278.
  • 10陈廉,张潇潇.瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩时机及分娩方式的选择[J].中华实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(8):594-596.

共引文献718

同被引文献414

引证文献71

二级引证文献339

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部