烧伤病房陪护人员不同洗手方法的效果探讨

Effects of different hand-washing methods in accompanying nursing people in Burn Ward

目的：探讨烧伤病房陪护人员2种不同洗手方法的洗手效果。方法采用便利抽样法选取2015年8—12月烧伤患者的陪护人员150人，根据患者入院先后进行编号，奇数分入对照组（75人），用健之素牌抗菌洗手液（Ⅰ）＋七步洗手法揉搓3 min 后用流动水冲洗30 s，待自然干燥后留取样本；偶数分入试验组（75人），采用健之素牌复合醇手消毒液＋七步洗手法揉搓1 min，待自然干燥后留取样本。比较两组洗手前后细菌检测阳性率。结果洗手前，两组细菌检测阳性率差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）；洗手完成时及洗手后2 h，阳性率差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）。结论2种消毒方法均可用于陪护人员的手部清洗消毒，但健之素牌复合醇手消毒液刺激性和作用时间低于健之素牌抗菌洗手液，是一种更方便、快捷、高效的消毒方法。

Objective To discuss the effects of two different hand-washing methods of accompanying nursing staff members in Burn Ward.Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select 1 50 accompanying nursing staff members of patients with burn injury from August 201 5 to December 201 5.They were divided in to experimental group （even number）and control group （odd number）according to the sequence number of hospitalization.In the control group,accompanying nursing staffs were used health essence anti-virus hand soap （I）plus seven-step hand-washing method to wash hands for 3 minutes,followed by rinsing with running water for 30s,leaving specimen after natural drying.Accompanying nursing staffs in the experimental group were used health essence mixtalol hand disinfectant plus seven-step hand-washing method to wash hands for one minute,leaving specimen after natural drying.Positive rates of bacteria were compared between the two groups before and after hand-washing.Results The positive rates of bacteria between two groups before and after hand-washing and 2 h after hand washing had no statistical significance （P 〉0.05）. Conclusions The two sterilizing methods can both be used in accompanying nursing staffs to wash and sterilize hands.The irritation effect of health essence mixtalol hand disinfectant is significantly lower than health essence anti-virus hand soap,which is a more convenient and effective sterilizing method.