关于高考议论文评分标准的新构想

New Ideas for Scoring Argumentative Writing for the College Entrance Examination

本文从理论分析和评分经验两方面探讨高考议论文评分标准,提出不分＂基础等级＂＂发展等级＂,采用小评分量表分项评分,分项采用4等级评分的框架建议;提出高考议论文评分量表新的构想,评分指标包括＂观点符合题意、明确＂＂论据有效、充分＂＂论证有效,具体深入＂＂结构合理完整,层次分明＂＂语言准确通顺,严密得体＂＂符合逻辑,有说服力＂;分项评分采用0~3等级评分,体现评分的层次性,0代表无或不对,关乎对不对的问题,1、2、3分别代表一般、中、好,关乎好不好的问题;评分操作借鉴全国中学教师资格考试面试的评分办法,只要在＂评分＂栏输入0~3分,系统便会自动生成总分,可操作性强。

From both the theoretical and practical perspective, this study explores issues on the scoring criteria of argumentative writing for the College Entrance Examination and suggests the use of a simple analytic scoring scale involving four levels rather than a complicated scale involving not only ＂basic levels＂ but also ＂developmental levels＂. The scoring descriptors include ＂relevant and clear claims＂, ＂valid and adequate evidence＂, ＂effective, detailed and in-depth reasoning＂, ＂sound, complete and hierarchical structure＂ , ＂accurate, smooth, rigorous and decent language＂ and ＂logic and persuasive argument＂. The scale ranks performance at levels 0-3. While 0 represents no writing or a wrong response, concerning right or wrong, 1, 2 and 3 represent average, fair and good respectively, concerning good or poor. As soon as the analytical scores are inputted into the computer, a total score is automatically generated, and this has proved to be very practical and reliable in the oral interview for the National Teacher Certification Examination.