期刊文献+

不完全信息下公共租赁住房匹配机制--基于偏好表达策略的实验研究 被引量:10

The Public Rental Housing Mechanism with Incomplete Information: An Experimental Study Based on Preference Revelation Strategies
原文传递
导出
摘要 在价格机制不能充分发挥作用的社会资源分配中,G-S匹配机制被理论证明具有稳定配置资源的性能,IIRSD机制则是目前国内实际采用的公共租赁住房匹配机制。本文在实验室模拟我国公租房匹配情景,在不完全信息环境中运用随机摇号序列作为轮候人的优先权顺序,考察轮候人在G-S与IIRSD两种机制下的偏好表达策略,同时分析了匹配中的策略行为与个人理性及风险偏好的关系;计算并检验由此带来的个人效用与整体福利变化;构建无嫉妒公平分配指数来测度匹配结果的公平程度,从而直接比较两种机制在公平、效率与无策略性等方面的效果。实验结果表明,G-S机制不仅能促使被试真实表达自己的偏好,而且是比IIRSD机制更公平、更有效率的设计。 G- S mechanism was proved to be matched with a stable performance in resource allocation when the price mechanism cannot fully play its role in society to allocate resources. However, IIRSD mechanism was currently used to match with the public rental housing in China. In this paper, we simulated real matching with public rental housing in laboratory and used Yaohao random sequence to generate the order of individuals' priority as waiting with the incomplete information environment, in order to investigate individuals' strategy in expressing their preferences under the both G - S and IIRSD mechanisms. We also analyzed the relationship between the strategic behavior and individuals rational behavior or risk preferences; computed and tested personal utility and changes in overall welfare;buih a fair distribution of envy free index to measure the fairness of matching consequences, which directly compared the effect of both mechanisms in fair, efficient and non-strategic aspects. This study also has been tested the robustness of experimental results by changing the design, the number of group matches and simulating all the possible orders of priority. These experimental results show that G - S mechanism can promote not only the individuals to express their true preferences, and also is more fair and efficient design than IIRSD mechanism.
作者 邓红平 罗俊 Deng Hongping Luo Jun(Central China Normal University Real Estate Development Research Center, Hubei Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Zhejiang University)
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期168-182,共15页 Economic Research Journal
基金 教育部人文社会科学项目“公共租赁住房匹配机制实验研究”(14YJAZH014)的研究成果之一 国家社科基金重大项目“我国住房保障问题与改革创新研究”(11&ZD039)资助
关键词 公共租赁住房匹配 IIRSD机制 G—S机制 无嫉妒公平分配指数 Public Housing Allocation IIRSD Mechanism G - S Mechanism Fair Distribution of Envy Free Index
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Abdulkadiroglu,A. , P.A. Pathak, E. R. Alvin, and T. Snmez, 2005, "The Boston Public School Match", American Economic Review, Vol. 95(2) ,368--371.
  • 2Abdulkadiroglu, A. , and T. Sfinmez, 1998, "Random Serial Dictatorship and the Core from Random Endowments in House Allocation Problems", Econometrica, Vol. 66 (3) ,689--701.
  • 3Abdulkadiroglu,A. , and T. Snmez, 1999, " House Allocation with Existing Tenants", Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 88 (2) , 233--260.
  • 4Abdulkadiroglu,A. , and T. Sfinmez.2003, " School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach", American Economic Review, Vol. 93 (3), 729--747.
  • 5Athanassoglou, S. , and J. Sethuraman, 2011, "House Allocation with Fractional Endowments", International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 40(3) ,481--513.
  • 6Balinski, M. , and T. SSnmez, 1999, "A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement", Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 84( 1 ), 73 --94.
  • 7Bohon, G. E. , 1991, "Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence", American Economic Review, Vol. 81 (5) , 1096-- 1136.
  • 8Bolton, G. E. , and A. Ockenfels, 2000, " ERC-A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition", American Economic Review, Vol. 90( 1 ), 166--193.
  • 9Calsamiglia, C. , G. Haeringer, and F. Klijn, 2009, " Constrained School Choice: An Experimental Study", American I'eonomw Review, Vol. 100(4), 1860--1874.
  • 10Carrillo, J. , and S. Singhal, 2016, "Tiered Housing Allocation with Pre-announced Rankings : An Experimental Analysis", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 25 (1) , 133--160.

同被引文献213

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部