期刊文献+

国家自主性与国家能力的关联性论析 被引量:8

An Analysis of the Relevance between State Autonomy and State Capacity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "国家自主性"与"国家能力"既相互区别但又紧密联系。国家自主性理论历经从相对自主性到潜在自主性再到实际自主性的发展变化,侧重强调国家行为逻辑与利益的主体性和超然性。作为国家贯彻自身意志的能力,国家能力既可指国家拥有的基本"潜能",也包括特定领域的"显能",更强调的是国家自主行为的资格与条件。国家自主性与国家能力的内在关联,不是简单的正相关逻辑。作为都涉及程度差异的解释性变量来说,基础性国家能力是国家自主性的前提与基础,国家自主性对于国家能力有着增强或削弱的双重影响。两者对于分析现代国家建构具有重要价值,但作为需要准确解释的变量,两者的关联性更需以分析归纳法和比较历史分析为主要方法的实证性研究为支撑。 "State autonomy" is different from "state capacity", but they are closely linked. The theory of state autonomy which emphasizes on the subjectivity and transcendence of the logic and interests of state behavior has experienced changes from relative autonomy to latent autonomy to practical autonomy. As the :ountry's ability to carry out its own will, the state capacity can refer to both the basic "potential" owned 3y the state and the "obvious energy" of a particular field, it emphasizes more on the qualifications and :onditions of the state's autonomous behavior. The intrinsic relationship between state autonomy and state apacity is not a simple positive correlation logic. As an explanatory variable that involves varying degrees f difference, basic state capacity is the prerequisite and basis of state autonomy, and state autonomy has a ouble effect on the strengthening or weakening of state capacity. Both of which are of great value for the alysis of modern state construction. But as the variables that need to be explained accurately, the re/e- race of the two is more supported by the empirical research on the methods of analytic induction and com- prative historical analysis.
作者 戴辉礼
出处 《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第5期39-46,共8页 Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目"政党体制与国家能力的关联性研究:以东亚国家为例"(2014M561395)
关键词 国家自主性 国家能力 比较历史分析 state autonomy state capacity comparative historical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1尼科斯·波朗查斯.政治权力与社会阶级[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1982.
  • 2米利本德.马克思主义与政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984:79.
  • 3EVANS Peter B. Bring the state back in [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • 4西达·斯考切波.国家与社会革命——对法国、俄国和中国的比较分析[M].何俊志,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2007.
  • 5埃里克A诺德林格.民主国家的自主性EM].孙荣飞,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2010.
  • 6乔尔S米格代尔.强社会与弱国家——第三世界的国家社会关系及国家能力[M].张长东,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2012:5(前言).
  • 7彼得·埃文斯,迪特里希·鲁施迈耶,西达·斯考克波.找回国家EM3.方力维,莫宜端,黄琪轩,译.北京:三联书店,2009.
  • 8弗朗西斯·福山.国家构建:21世纪的国家治理与世界秩序[M].黄胜强,许铭原,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社.2007:1-2.
  • 9KRASNER Stephan, Defending the national interest [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984: 58.
  • 10MANN Michael. States, war and capitalism [M]. Oxford: Blaekwell, 1988: 5-9.

共引文献30

同被引文献104

引证文献8

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部