期刊文献+

中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表在危重患儿中的信效度分析 被引量:11

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 翻译中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表并进行信效度检验。 方法 应用 Brislin 双人翻译及回译法对量表进行文化调适,形成中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表。对 56 例患儿的 582 次测量结果进行分析,评价其信度与效度。结果 中文版 WAT鄄1 共有 11 个条目,因子分析提取 4 个公因子,累积贡献率为 57.54% 。 该量表 Cronbach' s α 系数为0.812 ,各因子 Cronbach' s α 系数为 0.701-0.942 ,组内相关系数( intraclass correlation coefficient , ICC )为 0.930 。 中文版WAT鄄1 量表的内容效度为 0.910 ,各维度间的相关系数为 0.292-0.530 ,各维度与量表总分间的相关系数为 0.344-0.638 ,均具有统计学意义( P〈0.01 )。 ROC 曲线显示,以 WAT鄄1 总分 ≥3 分为判定戒断症状发生的临界值,特异度为 76.18% 、敏感度为 83.36% 。 结论 中文版 WAT鄄1 量表具有较好的信度和效度,且以总分 ≥3 分作为临界值,判定是否发生戒断症状,可以应用于儿童镇痛镇静药物戒断症状的评估。 Objective To translate the English version of Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 (WAT-1) into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of WAT-1. Methods The WAT-1 was trans- lated and adapted according to Chinese culture. Totally 582 records from 56 children were used to test the relia- bility and validity of the Chinese version of WAT-1. Results The Chinese version of WAT-1 consisted of 11 items,four factors were extracted by factor analysis which could explain 57.536% of the total variance. The Cron- bach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.812,and Cronbach's α coefficient of each factor ranged from 0.701 to 0.942. The intra-elass correlation coefficient was 0.93. The content validity index was 0.91 ,the correlation coeffi- cients among each dimension ranged from 0.292 to 0.530,and the correlation coefficient between each dimension score and total score ranged from 0.344 to 0.638. Concurrent validity was indicated by high sensitivity(83.36%) and specificity(76.18%). Conclusion The WAT-1 showed excellent preliminary psychometric performance when used to assess clinically important withdrawal symptoms in the PICU settings.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期1376-1379,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2015WS0248)
关键词 戒断症状 信度 效度 Substance Withdrawal Syndrome Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Polaner DM. Sedation-analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit[J]. Pediatr Clin Noah Am,2001, 48(3) :695-714.
  • 2Jenkins IA,Playfor SD,Bevan C,et al. Current United Kingdom sedation prac- tice in pediatric intensive careIJ].Pae- diatr Anaesth, 2007,17(7) :675-683.
  • 3Tobias JD. Tolerance,withdrawal and physical dependency after long-term sedation and analgesia of children in the pediatric intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Meal,2000,28(6) :2122-2132.
  • 4Tanaka. Risk factor of withdrawal syn- drome in the pediatric ICU[J]. Critical Care,2014,18(Suppl 1 ) :421.
  • 5Twite MD,Rashid A,Zuk J,et al. Se- dation,analgesia,and neuromuscular blo- ckade in the pediatric intensive care unit:survey of fellowship training pro- grams [J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med,2004, 5(6) :521-532.
  • 6Franck LS,Harris SK,Soetenga DJ,et al. The Withdrawal As- sessment Tool-1 (WAT-1):an assessment instrument for moni- toting opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms in pe- diatric patients[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2008,9(6):573-580.
  • 7Franck LS,Scoppettuolo LA,Wypij D,et al. Validity and gen- eralizability of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) for monitoring iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in pediatric patients[J]. Pain, 2012,153 ( 1 ) : 142-148.
  • 8Best KM,Boullata JI,Curley MAQ. Risk factors associated with benzodiazepine opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal in criti- cally ill pediatric patients :a systematic review and conceptual model[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med,2015,16(2) : 175-183.
  • 9Harris J,Ramelet AS,van Dijk M,et al. Clinical recommenda- tions for pain,sedation,withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children:an ESPNIC position state- ment for healthcare professionals[Jl.Crit Care Med,2016,42(6): 1-15.
  • 10陈长英,郝莉,冯娅婷.安全组织量表中文版在重症监护室医护人员中的信效度评定[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(4):400-403. 被引量:9

二级参考文献50

共引文献229

同被引文献57

引证文献11

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部