期刊文献+

解释驱动探究促进学生化学概念理解的研究 被引量:3

Promoting Students’ Understanding of Chemistry Concepts Based On Explanation-Driven Inquiry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用准实验研究设计,选择高一年级2个班的学生作为实验对象,对实验组学生进行教学干预,让他们采用解释驱动探究学习电解质和氧化还原反应概念,控制组学生按照学校正常教学安排进行.结果显示实验组学生的概念理解高于控制组,并且对氧化还原反应概念的理解呈现显著性差异.解释驱动探究有效促进了学生对科学概念的理解和迁移,并消除了相异构想. This paper selected two classes as experimental subjects based on quasi-experimental design. The experimental group was treated using explanation-driven inquiry to learn electrolyte and oxidation-reduction reaction, while control group was on school schedule by their own teachers. The results showed that the experimental group students had higher scores on concept understanding assessment, and had significant difference in understanding concept of oxidation-reduction reaction. The conclusion was that explanation-driven inquiry could effectively promote students' understanding of chemistry concepts, and eliminate students' some misconceptions.
出处 《化学教育》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第21期29-35,共7页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题"社会发展视域下中学理科课程的适切性研究"(课题批准号:BHA140081)
关键词 解释驱动探究 概念学习 相异构想 电解质 氧化还原反应 explanation-driven inquiry concept learning alternative framework electrolyte oxidation-reduction reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Gilbert J K. International Journal of Science Education,2006, 28 (9): 957-976.
  • 2邵瑞珍.教育心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1999..
  • 3卢姗姗,毕华林.从“科学探究”到“科学实践”——科学教育的观念转变[J].教育科学研究,2015(1):65-70. 被引量:47
  • 4(美)国家研究理事会.科学探究与国家科学教育标准.罗星凯,等译.北京:科学普及出版社,2004: 24.
  • 5National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation: Practice, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.Washington, D. C. : The National Academies Press,2012: 42.
  • 6Minner D D,Levy A J, Century J. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 2010,47 (4) : 474-496.
  • 7Sandoval W A, Reiser B J. Science Education, 2004,88(3): 345-372.
  • 8卢姗姗,毕华林.化学学习中“电解质”概念相异构想的跨年级研究[J].化学教育,2013,34(12):36-40. 被引量:10
  • 9D.P.奥苏贝尔.教育心理学--认知观点.北京:人民教育出版社,1994.
  • 10Kwon Y J,Lawson A E. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 2000, 37 (1) : 44-62.

二级参考文献41

  • 1张海霞,王祖浩.国外有关“电化学”知识相异构想的研究[J].中学化学教学参考,2007(5):57-61. 被引量:4
  • 2毕华林.化学教育,1996,(9):23-25.
  • 3Calik M.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,2005,3 (4):671-696.
  • 4Chi M T H,Slotta J D,De Leeuw N.Learning and instruction,1994,4 (1):27-43.
  • 5Chiu M H,Guo C J,Treagust D F.International Journal of Science Education,2007,29 (4):379-390.
  • 6Chiu M H.International Journal of Science Education,2007,29 (4):421-452.
  • 7Claesgens J,Scalise K,Wilson M,et al.Science Education,2009,93 (1):56-85.
  • 8Disessa A A,Sherin B L.International Journal of Science Education,1998,20 (10):1155-1191.
  • 9Duit R.Research on students' conceptions:developments and trends[C] //The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics,Ithaca,NY:Misconceptions Trust.1993.
  • 10Garnett P J,Treagust D F.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1992,29 (10):1079-1099.

共引文献64

同被引文献8

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部