期刊文献+

孤儿药研发的动态博弈与最优策略研究 被引量:1

Dynamic Game and Optimal Strategies of Orphan Drug R&D
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来孤儿药短缺问题愈加凸显。解决孤儿药短缺问题的关键在于提高制药企业的积极性,而企业积极性的提高又有赖于政府的政策激励。但是,目前我国仍然缺乏成型且有效的政策激励手段。本研究基于药物经济学、投资评估理论并参考美国的《孤儿药法案》,分析了政府和企业之间复杂的动态博弈关系,建立了三阶段动态博弈模型。模型分析结果显示,政府补贴在企业和患者之间的分配与企业收益之间呈现正U型关系。此外,要扼制企业策略性获取补贴的动机,必须使弱型企业不投机时的期望收益不小于其投机时的期望收益。而政府可以通过调整资金在不同类型企业之间的分配比例α以及在博弈不同阶段的分配比例β,来满足这一关系。 Nowadays, the problem of orphan drug shortage is becoming more and more serious. The key to tackle this problem is to enhance the enthusiasm of pharmaceutical enterprises. In addition, the government policy incentives are also crucial to enterprise initiatives. However, standard and effective methods of government stimuli are lacked in China. Based on pharmacoeconomics, investment appraisal and Orphan Drug Act in the US, the complex game relationship between government and enterprises is depicted in this paper. By constructing and analyzing the three-stage dynamic game model, the result demonstrated that there was a U-shape relationship between government allocation of grants and enterprises' expected profits. Moreover, in order to deter the enterprises' motive to strategically obtain subsidy, their expected earnings should be no less than those on speculation. Government can accomplish this by adjusting the proportion of grants allocation between different kinds of enterprises(α) and different stages(β).
作者 韩晨 高山行
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2016年第10期960-967,共8页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(编号11&ZD170) 国家自然科学基金项目(编号71172187)
关键词 孤儿药研发 政策 激励 动态博弈 最优策略 orphan drug R&D policy incentives dynamic game optimal strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1刘炳林.国外孤儿药政策概述及启示[J].中药新药与临床药理,2002,13(5):332-333. 被引量:15
  • 2FDA:How to Apply for Orphan Drug Designation[EB/OL].[2013-11-22].http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/HowtoapplyforOrphanProductDesignation/ucm365086.htm.
  • 3EMA.Orphan Designation[EB/OL].[2013-11-22].http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000029.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac05800240ce.
  • 4陈一昀.罕见病特效药或将进医保目录[N].新金融观察,2012-06-11(29).
  • 5我国加大生物医药的投资力度[EB/OL].(2007-06-13)[2013-11-22].http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/b/20070613/13223688158.shtml.
  • 6中国外商投资企业协会药品研制和开发行业委员会.全力提升中国医药产业创新能力研究报告[R].2012.
  • 7Braun M M,Farag-El-Massah S,Xu K,et al.Emergence of Orphan Drugs in the United States:A Quantitative Assessment of the First 25 years[J].Nature Reviews Drug Discovery,2010,9(7):519-522.
  • 8Rohde D D.Orphan Drug Act:An Engine of Innovation-At What Cost,The[J].Food&Drug LJ,2000,55:125-126.
  • 9Denis A,Mergaert L,Fostier C,et al.A Comparative Study of European Rare Disease and Orphan Drug Markets[J].Health Policy,2010,97(2):173-179.
  • 10Heemstra H E,van Weely S,Büller H A,et al.Translation of Rare Disease Research into Orphan Drug Development:Disease Matters[J].Drug Discovery Today,2009,14(23):1166-1173.

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]北京诺华制药有限公司医学信息咨询部.最新国外药品注册法规汇编[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.
  • 2US. Rare Diseases and Related Terms. [ EB/OL]. http://rare diseases, info. nih. gov/Rare Disease List. aspx? PagelD = 1.
  • 3朱维芳.关于制定《罕见疾病防治法》的议案[EB/OL].[2009-3-11].http://www.caijing.eom.cn/20094)3-09/110115538.html.
  • 4J. L. Freeman, The Policy Process, New York. Doubleday, 1965, pp.60-63.
  • 5T. J. Lowi, The End of Liberalism, New York. Norton, 1979, p.24.
  • 6K. J. Benson, "A Framework for Policy Analysis" in D. L. Rogers & D. Whetten (eds.), Interorganizatiomd Coordi- nation. Theory Research and Implementation, Ames, IA. Iowa State University Press, 1982, p.121.
  • 7张舵,王晓洁.《"孤儿药"产业亟待政策支持》,《经济参考报》2013年1月4日.
  • 8J. S. Coleman, "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology, 1988, vol.94.
  • 9Zaur Rzakhanov, "Regulatory Policy, Value of Knowledge Assets and Innovation Strategy. the Case of the Orphan Drug Act", Research Policy, 2008, vol.37, no.4.
  • 10曾智,杨悦,令狐昌黎,汤涵.拟建我国罕用药政策制度的探讨与建议[J].中国药房,2009,20(10):737-740. 被引量:7

共引文献32

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部