跳出此山见真面——新记《大公报》“小骂大帮忙”的另样审视

Some New Views on "Pretended Blame and True Support" of Xinji "Ta Kung Pao"

对于一个有着百年历史的大报来说,《大公报》的是非功过在学术界一直有着诸多争论,而有关新记《大公报》(以下简称《大公报》)对国民党"小骂大帮忙"的争论就是一个焦点。争论双方就《大公报》到底有没有对国民党"小骂大帮忙",是骂的成分多一点,还是帮的成分多一点展开了激烈的争辩,似乎想给《大公报》一个历史定位。本文在检视"小骂大帮忙"争辩双方的主要论点基础上,试图找寻这场争辩的背后推动力,并依此为基础,反思我们当前新闻史研究的某些不足之处以及"小骂大帮忙"对当下新闻生产的启示。

As a well-known newspaper with a hundred years of history, ＂Ta Kung Pao＂ has always been debated in the aca- demic circle about its achievements and errors, while the debate on the ＂pretended blame and true support＂ of Xinji ＂Ta Kung Pao＂（hereinafter referred to as ＂Ta Kung Pao＂） for the Nation- alist Party is a focus. A fierce debate was launched between two sides on whether blame or support is more, seemingly intending to set up a historical position for ＂Ta Kung Pao＂. Based on sum- marizing the main arguments of both sides, this paper attempts to find out the motivation behind the debate, and on this basis, ponders over the deficiencies of the present research on news history, as well as the enlightenment of ＂pretended blame and true support＂ to contemporary news production.