“战国策派”研究的历史还原与价值突围

Integration and Change: Restoration and Reevaluation of Strategies of the Warring States Clique

学术界关于"战国策派"的内涵、成员、聚合、刊物、外围等问题依然模糊不清或者莫衷一是。至于它与《民族文学》、五四新文化运动、法西斯主义、国民党的关系等等,更显得神秘混沌。因此,"战国策派"亟需得到辨析和考证。学界意识到"战国策派"具有综合性、多学科的特质,却忽视了它的流变性、阶段性的特征。同时,"战国策派"的研究仍未能摆脱固定的模式,尤其是左翼思维模式。要把握"战国策派"真实的状况,必须在立场上超越、价值上突围,跳出目前研究中存在的预设框架和思维模式,回到历史现场和历史语境中,从原始刊物入手还原"战国策派"的基本史实,并对关键性的问题进行考查论述。

There is no scholarly unanimity concerning the meaning, participants, organization, journals, etc., and people are more confused about its relation to National Literature, the May-fourth New Culture Movement, Fascism and KMT. Though having noticed the integrity and interdisciplinary of the clique, scholars neglect its mobility and periodicity, and their perspective remains stubbornly left-winged. Therefore a better understanding of the clique requires a new formula and a return to its historical context through an investigation of original publications.