期刊文献+

剖析语块的激进构式语法进路

A Radical Constructional Approach to Language Chunks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对语块分析研究时把构式作为起始点,从整体到部分先切入语义结构部分,考虑语义成分之间的组构关系,通过象征连接进入句法形式结构来给句法成分和句法关系进行定位,这是激进构式语法的基本思路,用来点击式地分析英语习语一例和汉语简单动结式的原型,似乎比传统的语言学方法更进一步。 Constructions are analytic primitives and meronomic. As only the semantic structure of the construction is componential, syntactic elements and relationships can only be defined within constructions via symbolic form-meaning links so language chunks are analyzable at least at the semantic level. A case study of an English idiom and a Chinese simple resultative construction is adumbrated herein to prove this point.
作者 熊学亮
出处 《山东外语教学》 2016年第5期3-8,共6页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 国家社科基金项目"英汉复合结构的对比研究"(项目编号:12BYY010)的阶段性成果
关键词 整体与部分 语义组构 象征连接 语块 激进构式语法 meronomic structure semantic level symbolic relationship chunk radical construction grammar
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bolinger, D. The Phrasal Verb in English[ M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  • 2Croft, W. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective[ M]. Beijing: World Book Publishing Company, 2009.
  • 3Gao, Q. Resultative verb compounds and Ba-construction in Chinese[ J ]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1997: 84 - 130.
  • 4Goldberg, A. E. Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago : Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 5Gu, Y. The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese[ D]. PhD Dissertation, Cornelt Universi- ty, 1992.
  • 6Kratzer, A. Building resuhatives[ A]. In C. Maienborn & A. Wllstein( eds. ). Event Arguments: Foundation and Applications [ C ]. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, 2005. 177 - 212.
  • 7Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol I: Theoretical Prerequisites[ M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 8Li, Y. F. On V-V compounds in Chinese [ J ]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1990, ( 8 ) : 177 - 207.
  • 9Li, Y. F. The thematic hierarchy and causativity[J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1995, (2) :255 - 282.
  • 10Nunberg, G. The nonuniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy [ J ]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1979, (3) : 143 - 184.

二级参考文献37

  • 1沈家煊.动结式“追累”的语法和语义[J].语言科学,2004,3(6):3-15. 被引量:66
  • 2王红旗.动结式述补结构在把字句和重动句中的分布[J].语文研究,2001(1):6-11. 被引量:37
  • 3熊仲儒,刘丽萍.动结式的论元实现[J].现代外语,2006,29(2):120-130. 被引量:53
  • 4Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language [M]. New York: Holt.
  • 5Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Croft, W. 2007. Construction grammar [A]. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens 2007. (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. 463-508.
  • 7Fillmore, C., P. Kay&M. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone [J].Language 64: 501-538.
  • 8Frege, G. 1892. On sense and reference [A]. In P. Gearch & M. Black (eds.). 1970. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege [C]. Oxford:Blackwell. 56-78.
  • 9Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work[M]. New York.. OUP.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部