期刊文献+

论辩语篇中的言据性策略 被引量:6

Evidential Strategies in Argumentative Discourses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论辩语篇是一种以说理为首要目的、以论证为主要修辞手法、以交互沟通为交际目的的综合性议论语篇。而作为表述命题知识来源及信度的语言表征,言据性编码了说话人/作者对语篇命题的态度评价和介入程度。本文以言据性研究为基础,重新审视知识来源与证素使用之间的语用关联性,通过分析英汉论辩语篇中的言据性策略来研究说话人/作者提高语篇观点信度和表述有效性的论辩语篇组织模式。 Argumentative discourse is the discourse that takes persuasion as the primary purpose, logic reasoning as the major rhetoric device, and interaction as the communicative goal. As the linguistic representation encoding the information source of the said proposition and indicating its credibility, evidentiality embodies the speaker' s/writer's assessment of information sources and his/her involvement in the propositions of discourses. This paper, through reexamining the pragmatic correlation between information source and evidential markers, explores how the speaker/writer organizes the whole argumentation through the application of evidential strategies in order to ensure the reliability of arguments and also ex- press opinions in a more effective way.
作者 陈征 俞东明
出处 《山东外语教学》 2016年第5期24-32,共9页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 上海高校青年教师培养资助计划的资助 上海理工大学教师教学发展研究项目(项目编号:CFTD16029Y) 国家社科基金项目"英语阅读记忆系统的交互性研究"(项目编号:15BYY101)的阶段性成果
关键词 论辩语篇 言据性 证素 知识来源 观点信度 argumentative discourse evidentiality evidential markers information source reliability of arguments
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Bakhtin, M. Speech Genre and Other Late Essays [ M]. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.
  • 2Boas, F. Kwakiutl grammar, with a glossary of the suffixes [J]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1947, (37) :201 - 377.
  • 3Chafe, W. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing[ A]. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology[ C]. Norwood: Ahlex, 1986. 261 -273.
  • 4Chafe, W. & J. Nichols (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology[C]. Norwood: Ahlex, 1986.
  • 5Feteris, E. Strategic maneuvering in the justification of judicial decisions[ A]. In F. H. van Eemeren ( ed. ). Examining Argu- mentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuring[ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009.93 - 114.
  • 6van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic Marveuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumenta- tion[ M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
  • 7van Eemeren, F. H. & B. Garssen. In varietate concordia--United in diversity: European parliament debate as an argumenta- tive activity type [ J ]. Contraversia, 2010,7 ( 1 ) : 19 - 37.
  • 8van Eemeren, F. H. & B. Garssen. Exploring the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audi- ence demand in the European parliament [ A ]. In F. H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst ( eds. ). Exploring Argumentative Contexts [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.43 - 58.
  • 9van Eemeren, F. H. & R. Grootendorst. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical model for the Analysis of Dis- cnssions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion[ M]. Berlin: de Gruvter, 1984.
  • 10van Eemeren, F. H. & R. Grootendorst. Studies in Pragma-Dialectics [M]. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 1994.

二级参考文献121

共引文献498

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部