期刊文献+

道路交通事故死亡人数预测模型对比研究 被引量:15

Comparison study on prediction models of death toll for road traffic accidents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确预测交通事故死亡人数,选取人、车、路和经济发展水平作为主要因素,建立GM(1,1)和Verhulst模型,进行事故预测和精度分析。结合马尔科夫方法,对已建立的模型进行修正,构建GM(1,1)-Markov,GM(1,3)-Markov和Verhulst-Markov模型。应用上述模型预测安徽省2012—2014年交通事故死亡人数。分析结果表明:应用GM(1,1)-Markov模型,3年预测值的相对误差分别为-8.4%,-12.81%和-13.18%;应用GM(1,3)-Markov模型,3年预测值的相对误差分别为-31.86%,-44.66%和-57.50%;应用Verhulst-Markov模型,3年预测值的相对误差分别为-2.68%,-2.88%和-2.42%。Verhulst-Markov模型的预测精度更高,可用来预测今后的道路交通事故死亡人数。 In order to predict accurately death toll caused by road traffic accidents, the people-vehicle-road and economic development level were selected as major factors, GM (1,1) model and Verhulst model were set up, and accident prediction and accuracy analysis were carried out. combined with Markov method, the two models were corrected, GM(1,3)-Markov model, GM(1,1)-Markov model and Verhulst-Markov model were built, and road traffic accident death tolls were predicted for Anhui Province of 2012 to 2014. Analysis result shows that by using GM (1,1)-Markov model, the relative errors are - 8.4%,- 12.81%,- 13.18%,that by using GM (1,3)-Markov model, the relative errors are-31.86%,-44.66%,-57.50%,that by using Verhulst-Markov model, the relative errors are-2.68%,-2.88%,-2.42%,and that accuracy of the Verhulst-Markov model is much higher, it can be applied to the actual road traffic accident prediction.
作者 张嘉琦
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期45-49,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(51308177 51178158) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20120111120021)
关键词 交通安全 道路交通事故 灰色理论 马尔科夫理论 死亡人数 预测模型 traffic safety road traffic accident grey model Markov theory death toll prediction model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献97

共引文献256

同被引文献163

引证文献15

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部