物理因子疗法配合温针治疗盆腔粘连所致慢性盆腔痛疗效观察

Observation of Therapeutic Effect on Chronic Pelvic Pain due to Pelvic Adhesion Treated by Physiotherapy Combined with Moxibustion with Warming Needle

目的:观察物理因子疗法配合温针治疗盆腔粘连所致慢性盆腔痛的效果。方法:96例随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组47例用物理因子疗法配合温针治疗,对照组49例只用物理因子疗法治疗,10次为一疗程,3个疗程后用数字疼痛评分法(numerical pain rating scale,NPRS)评分,并随访至治疗结束后半年。结果:观察组和对照组总有效率分别为93.62%和71.43%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前后NPRS评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后1个月、3个月、半年NPRS评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:物理因子疗法配合温针治疗盆腔粘连所致慢性盆腔疼痛疗效优于单用物理因子疗法治疗。

Objective ： To observe the clinical effect of physical factor therapy and warm acupuncture on chronic pelvic pain caused by pelvic adhesion. Method： 96 cases were divided into treatment group and control group randomly. 47 cases were treated by physical factor therapy （ audio frequency, ultrashort wave ） combined with warm acupuncture as the treatment group while 49 cases were treated by only physical factor therapy as the control group, 10 times as one course of treatment. After three courses of treatment, we evaluated pain scores digital pain score by numerical pain rating scale （NPRS） and we followed up until six months after the end of treatment. Result： The total effective rate of the treatment group and the control group were 93.62% and 71.43% respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups （ P〈0.05 ） . There was statistically significant difference in the NPRS score between the two groups at the time point of the 1st month, the 3rd month and the 6th month after treatment （P〈0.05） .Conclusion： The clinical effect of physical factor therapy and warm acupuncture on chronic pelvic pain caused by pelvic adhesion is superior to only physical factor therapy.