期刊文献+

论不作为侵权责任 被引量:3

On tort liability of omission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学界研究主要集中于作为方式的侵权行为上,对不作为方式能否构成侵权行为关注不够。从理论出发,结合司法实践的需要,讨论不作为侵权责任的成立要件并提出立法建议。研究不作为侵权责任有助于理论与实践的协力,发挥立法、学说与判例的作用,促进侵权责任法在民事领域得到更好的运用。 The research in academia is mainly focused on infringement of act,and whether omission can constitute infringement or not is not paid enough attention. Started from theory and combined with the demand of legal practice,the essential conditions of infringement are discussed concerning the tort liability of omission,and legislation suggestions are brought forward. To study the tort liability of omission can benefit the integration and cooperation of theory and practice,exert the functions of legislation,doctrine and precedents,and promote the better application of tort liability law in civil field.
作者 张浩良 ZHANG Hao-liang(Law School, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China)
出处 《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第5期459-464,共6页 Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L13DFX034)
关键词 侵权责任法 作为 不作为 侵权责任 成立要件 tort liability law act omission tort liability essential condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献42

  • 1W. L. Prosser, Law of Torts, 4^th ed, West, p338.
  • 2F. H. Lawson and B. S. Markesinis, Tortious Liability for Unintentional Harm in the Common Law and Civil Law, Cambridge University Press, pp. 71 - 72.
  • 3Bohlen, The Moral Duty to Aid Others as a Basis ofTort Liabihty, 1908, 56V. Pa. L. Rev. 217, 219.
  • 4Linden, 44Can. Bar Rev. (1966) 25, 29.
  • 5F. H. Lawson and B. S. Markesinis, p. 72.
  • 6H. F. McNiece and J. V. Thornton, 58 Yale L. J. (1949), 1272, 1288.
  • 7W. V. H. Rogers, Wit, field and Jolowicz on Tort, thirteen edition, Sweet&Maxwell, pp. 91-92
  • 8The Occupier's Liability Act 1957, The Factories Act 1961.
  • 9The Mines and Quarries Act 1954.
  • 10F. H. Lawson and B. S.Markesinis,p.74.

共引文献19

同被引文献31

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部