员工依恋风格、社会认同与建言行为:辱虐管理之有调节的中介被引量：5

Subordinates' Attachment Styles, Social Identity and Voice Behavior: The Moderated Mediating Role of Abusive Supervision

下载PDF

导出

摘要全球性金融危机促使组织关注"人"的因素,而依恋理论在组织行为领域的应用为我们解释工作场所中个体的心理与行为提供了参考。通过来自民营和国营两类企业上下级配对的365套问卷调查,深入探讨了员工依恋风格对建言行为的影响机制。结果表明,员工的安全依恋与反依恋风格经由社会认同的中介能够进一步影响建言行为,而领导的辱虐管理则在员工社会认同与建言行为之间起正向调节作用,即领导辱虐管理水平高时(相对与辱虐管理水平低时)员工的社会认同对建言行为的影响更明显。 The global financial crisis urged organizations to pay attention to the human element, and the attachment theory can help us explain the psychology and behavior of employees in the workplace. Based on 365 superiorsubordinate matched samples from privately-owned and state-owned enterprises in China, this paper explored the impact of subordinates' attachment styles on voice behavior. Results indicate that interdependence and counterdependence attachment styles indirectly predicted subordinates' voice behavior through social identity. Besides, the moderated mediating effect of abusive supervision were subsequently tested, the relationship between social identity and voice behavior was moderated by abusive supervision, and the impact of subordinates' social identity on voice behavior was much more significantly when in high abusive supervision than low.

作者朱迪傅强

机构地区衢州学院经贸管理学院苏州大学附属第一医院苏州大学中国特色城镇化研究中心

出处《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期112-120,191,共9页 Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

关键词依恋风格社会认同建言行为辱虐管理 attachment styles social identity voice behavior abusive supervision

分类号 F832 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献39

1DAVIS T J, MORRIS M, DRAKE M M. The moderation effect of mindfulness on the relationship between adult attachment and wellbeing[J]. Personality & Individual Differences, 2016, ( 7 ).
2NIE Y G, LI J B, VAZSONYI A T. Self-control mediates the associations between parental attachment and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents [J]. Personality & Individual Differences, 2016, ( 7 ).
3BOWLBY J. Attachment and loss: Vol 1. Attachment[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
4FRALEY R C. Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms [J]. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2002, ( 2 ).
5HAZAN C, SHAVER P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process [J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1987, ( 3 ).
6SNYDER R, SHAPIRO S, TRELEAVEN D. Attachment Theory and Mindfulness [J]. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 2012, ( 5 ).
7ADAMS S H, ADAMS S H. The relationships among adult attachment, general self-disclosure, and perceived organizational trust [D]. Virginia: Virginia Tech, 2004.
8CRANSHAW J, GAME A. Organizational career management: The role of line manager caregiving and employee relational models [C]. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal, Canada, 2010.
9KRAUSZ M, BIZMAN A, BRASLAVSKY D. Effects of Attachment Style on Preferences for and Satisfaction with Different Employment Contracts: An Exploratory Study[J]. Journal of Business & Psychology, 2001, ( 2 ).
10SUMER H C, KNIGHT P A. How do people with different attachment styles balance work and family? A personality perspective on work-family linkage [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, ( 4 ).

二级参考文献44

1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量：7723
2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量：3165
3刘益,刘军,宋继文,吴维库.不同情商水平下领导行为与员工组织承诺关系的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(2):12-18. 被引量：33
4Tepper, B. J.. Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academ, of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2): 178-190.
5Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J. M., Ensley, M. D.. Moderators of the Relationship between Coworkers' Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Fellow Employees' Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(3): 455-465.
6Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D.. Personality Moderators of the Relationships between Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(5): 974-983.
7Tepper, B. J.. Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 2007, 33(3): 261-289.
8Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C.. Coping with Abusive Supervision: The Neutralizing Effects of Ingratiation and Positive Affect on Negative Employee Outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 2007, 18(2): 264-280.
9Duffy, M., Ganster, D., Pagon, M.. Social Undermining in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(2): 331-351.
10Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K.. Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(6): 1068-1076.