2Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of open three field and minimal invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[ J ]. In- teract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011,12 ( 3 ) : 366-369.
1Jemal A, Bray F, Center M M, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011,61(2) : 69 -90.
2Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. The "best operation" for e- sophageal cancer? [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 89(6): $2163- $2167.
3Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England : a population-based national study [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255 ( 2 ) : 197 - 203.
4Parameswaran R, Titcomb D R, Blencowe N S, et al. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagecto- my for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2013, 20(6) : 1970 - 1977.
5Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, et aI. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[ J ]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Snrg, 2011, 12(3) : 366 -369.
6Berger A C, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esoph- agectomy[ J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2011, 212(4) : 560-568.
7Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically- assisted oesophageetomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised con- trolled phase Ill trial - the MIRO trial[ J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11: 310.
8Sihag S, Wright C D, Wain J C, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive lvor Lewis oesoph- ageetomy at a single, high-volume centre [ J ]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(3) : 430 -437.
9Rosati R, Fumagalli U, Elmore U, et al. Long-term results of mini- mally invasive surgery for symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2011,201 ( 1 ) : 132 - 135.
10Levy R M, Wizorek J, Shende M, et al. Laparoseopic and thoraco- scopie esophagectomy[ J]. Adv Surg, 2010, 44:101 -116.
