期刊文献+

防御性医疗可以保护医生免于医疗事故索赔吗?

原文传递
导出
摘要 Jena及其同事研究了一个关于美国医疗事故系统的长期悬而未决的问题(doi:10.1136/bmj.h5516):如果医生的医疗支出增加,那么他们面临被起诉的风险会降低吗’?这是一个重要问题,因为它探讨了美国医疗系统中有争议的防御性医疗问题和医疗事故索赔风险问题。
作者 梁立智
出处 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2016年第10期552-553,共2页 The BMJ Chinese Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Jena AB, Schoemaker L, Bhattacharya J, Seabury SA. Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study. BMJ 2015;351:h5561.
  • 2Bishop TF, Federman AD, Keyhani S. Physicians' views on defensive medicine: a national survey. Arch Intern Med 2010;170: 1081-3.
  • 3Mello MM, Chandra A, Gawande AA, et al. National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff(Millwood) 2010;29:1569-77.
  • 4Ortashi O, Virdee J, Hassan R, et al. The practice of defensive medicine among hospital doctors in the United Kingdom. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14:42.
  • 5Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, et al. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. NEngl JMed 2011;365:629-36.
  • 6Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 1994; 343:1609-13.
  • 7Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, et al. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA 1992;267:1359-63.
  • 8Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:245-51.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部