期刊文献+

北京地铁4号线与伦敦地铁PPP项目案例分析 被引量:4

A Comparative Analysis of PPP Projects of Beijing and London Metro Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 北京地铁4号线和伦敦地铁都是通过公私合营(PPP)的方式与融资能力强、具有一定经验的社会资本合作,北京地铁4号线自2009年开通以来一直运行良好,伦敦地铁PPP项目在运营不到7年就宣布破产。运用比较分析方法从融资结构、运营管理和合同履行3个方面对北京地铁4号线和伦敦地铁进行分析,发现伦敦地铁失败的原因主要是其融资结构不合理、竞争机制不完善、契约精神缺失,并针对这些问题为以后PPP项目的实践提出3点建议:1)在伙伴选择方面,引入竞争机制,项目公司市场化运营;2)优化融资结构,合理分担风险;3)强化契约精神,加强政府监管。 Beijing Subway Line 4 and London Underground both cooperate with the social capital with strong financing capacity and extensive experience by way of PPP. Beijing Subway Line 4 has been running well since its opening in 2009, while London PPP project was declared bankruptcy in less than seven years of operation. This paper analyzes Beijing Subway Line 4 and London Underground mainly from the three aspects of financing structure, operation mechanism and the performance of the contract, finding that unreasonable financing structure, imperfect competition mechanism and lack of contract spirit are the main causes for the failure of London Underground. To solve these problems, the author puts forward three suggestions: 1) competition mechanism should be introduced in partner selection and the operation of project companies should be market-oriented; 2) the financing structure should be optimized and risk-sharing rationalized; 3) the spirit of contract and government regulation should be strengthened.
出处 《都市快轨交通》 北大核心 2016年第5期41-45,共5页 Urban Rapid Rail Transit
基金 北京市哲学社会科学基地重点项目(15JDJA083)
关键词 北京地铁 伦敦地铁 融资结构 运营管理 风险分担 公私合营(PPP) Beijing subway London underground financing structure operation and management risk sharing PPP(Public-Private Partnership)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献78

共引文献775

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部