期刊文献+

意大利绩效风险分担协议实施经验及启示 被引量:6

Implementation Experience and Reference of Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements in Italy
原文传递
导出
摘要 2006年意大利针对高值药品实施绩效风险分担协议,该政策的实施有效提高了重特大疾病患者的可负担性与药物可及性,同降低了政府财政负担。目前,我国正探索实施高值药品谈判政策,通过介绍意大利绩效风险分担协议的背景、主要内容、谈判流程以及政策,以期为我国高值药品谈判政策的实施提供参考。 In 2006, Italy has implemented Good Practices for Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Anangements(PBRSAs) for high value drugs for critical illnesses. The implementation of policy effectively increased the affordability and availability of drugs for critical illness and reduced the financial burden of government. In current, China is exploring the negotiation policy of high value drugs tor critical illnesses. The background, main content, negotiation process and policy of Italy' s PBRSAs were introduced to provide references for the implementation of China's PBRSAs.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2016年第11期94-96,共3页 Chinese Health Economics
关键词 高值药品 绩效风险分担协议 意大利 high value drugs good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements Italy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1LIVIO G, CURTO A. VOOREN K V 0. Do the current perfor- mance-based schemes in haly really work? "Success fee": a novel measure for cost-contain- ment of drug expenditure[J]. Value in health, 2015,18(1): 131-136.
  • 2GGRRISON L P, TOWSE A, BRIGGS A, et al. Perfor- mance-based risk-sharing Ar- rangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for perfor- mance-based risk-sharing ar- rangements task torte[J]. Value in health, 2013,16(5):703-719.
  • 3ADAMSKI J, GODMAN B, OFIERSKA-SUJKOWSKA G, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers[J]. BMC heahh services research, 2010,1 O( 1): 1 - 16.
  • 4林苡竹,陈文.青岛城镇大病医疗救助项目的政策分析[J].中国卫生资源,2015,18(3):203-207. 被引量:11

二级参考文献18

  • 1Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers[ J ]. BMC Health Serv Res,2010, 10: 153.
  • 2McCabe C, Bergmann L, Bosanquet N, et al. Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, muhidisciplinary perspective [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20 ( 3 ): 403-412.
  • 3Fojo T, Grady C. How much is life worth: cetuximab, non-smaU cell lung cancer, and the S440 billion question[ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009, 101: 1044-1048.
  • 4Guirgis HM. Proposal for a novel methodology to screen and score cost versus survival for anticancer drugs in metastatic disease: could cost weigh in evaluation?[ J ]. J Oncol Pract, 2012, 8( 4 ): 224-230.
  • 5Carlson JJ, Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, et al. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance- based reimbursement schemes between health care payers and manufacturers[ J ]. Health Policy, 2010, 96( 3 ): 179-190.
  • 6Vogler S, Zimmermann N, Habl C, et al. Discounts and rebates granted to public payers for medicines in European countries [ J ]. Southern Med Rev, 2012, 5( 1 ): 38-46.
  • 7Couhon L, Annemans L, Carter R, et al. Outcomes-based risk- sharing schemes: is there a potential rule in the Asia-Pacific markets?[ J ]. Health Out Res Med, 2012, 3( 4 ): c205-219.
  • 8青岛市人力资源和社会保障局.关于建立城镇大病医疗救助制度的意见(青政办字[2012]92号)[EB/OL].(2012-06-29).http: //www.qdhrss.gov.cn/pages/zczs/zcfgldbszcfg/55475.html.
  • 9Louis P, Garrison Jr, Towse A, et al. Performance-based risk- sharing arrangements--good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practice for performance- based risk-sharing arrangements task force [J]. Value Health, 2013( 16): 703-719.
  • 10Navarria A, Drago V, Gozzo L, et al. Do the current performance- based schemes in Italy really work? "Success fee": a novel measure for cost-containment of drug expenditure [ J ]. Value Health, 2015, 18( 1 ): 131-136.

共引文献10

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部