劳动者集体行动的界限及其制度化建构

The Boundary of Industrial Action and Its Institutional Construction

在我国目前劳资关系法律规制的状态下,将话题囿于劳动者有无集体行动权以及集体行动是否合法的层面上,就权利实现的角度而言存在很大的局限性。劳动者集体行动治理的制度化建构需要以实践中的问题来审视集体行动权的权利属性。从私权关系来看,集体行动属于私力救济性质的自助行为;从社会权关系来看,集体行动权属于劳动者团体的自我决定权。无论是私力救济权还是劳动者团体的自我决定权均存在严格的权利界限。劳动者集体行动的治理应当明确权利的界限,以这种权利界限为基础进行制度化建构,处理好劳动者集体行动的类型化区分及其一般条款的关系、劳动者的可支配行为与集体行动之间的关系。

In the current state of labor relations on legal regulation in our country, there is a great limitation in the view of the realization of the right to restrict the topic to whether the employees have the fight of collective action and its legitimacy. The institutionalized construction of the industrial action needs to examine the attribute of the right of collective action in practical problems. From the perspective of private right, industrial action belongs to self-help behavior of private relief nature; from the perspective of social fight, the right of industrial action belongs to the selfdetermination of employees. There is a strict limitation between the fight of private relief and the right of self-determination. The governance of the industrial action should clearly define the boundary of fights, and institutionalize and construct these relations on the basis of this fight boundary： the relationship between the classification of labor disputes and the general provisions of industrial action, and the relationship between the interests of employees and industrial action.